Hi all,
Would you mind casting your vote to this second vote thread (opened
after new discussions) so that the subject can move forward ?
@David, @Chesnay, @Robert you took part to the discussions, can you
please sent your vote ?
Thank you very much
Best
Etienne
Le 06/07/2023 à 13:02, Et
Hi all,
I'm going on vacation tonight for 3 weeks.
Even if the vote is not finished, as the implementation is rather quick
and the design discussion had settled, I preferred I implementing
FLIP-322 [1] to allow people to take a look while I'm off.
[1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/229
*+1 (non-binding)*
Thanks for working on this. We have seen good improvement during the cool
down period with this feature.
Below are details on the test results from one of our clusters:
On a scale-out operation, 8 new nodes were added one by one with a gap of
~30 seconds. There were 8 restarts
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:59 AM Prabhu Joseph
wrote:
> *+1 (non-binding)*
>
> Thanks for working on this. We have seen good improvement during the cool
> down period with this feature.
> Below are details on the test results from one of our clusters:
>
> On a scale-out operation, 8
+1(binding)
Thanks for driving this proposal, it will be useful for rescale.
I’m preparing the FLIP-334[1], it will decouple the autoscaler and
kubernetes. In the end, we hope all kind of flink jobs work well with
rescale and autoscaler.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.act
Hi Joseph,
Thanks for the detailled review !
Best
Etienne
Le 14/07/2023 à 11:57, Prabhu Joseph a écrit :
*+1 (non-binding)*
Thanks for working on this. We have seen good improvement during the cool
down period with this feature.
Below are details on the test results from one of our clusters:
Hi all,
As part of Flink bylaws, binding votes for FLIP changes are active
committer votes.
Up to now, we have only 2 binding votes. Can one of the committers/PMC
members vote on this FLIP ?
Thanks
Etienne
Le 08/08/2023 à 10:19, Etienne Chauchot a écrit :
Hi Joseph,
Thanks for the det
+1 (binding)
-Max
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 10:56 AM Etienne Chauchot wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As part of Flink bylaws, binding votes for FLIP changes are active
> committer votes.
>
> Up to now, we have only 2 binding votes. Can one of the committers/PMC
> members vote on this FLIP ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
Thanks Max!
Etienne
Le 09/08/2023 à 12:53, Maximilian Michels a écrit :
+1 (binding)
-Max
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 10:56 AM Etienne Chauchot wrote:
Hi all,
As part of Flink bylaws, binding votes for FLIP changes are active
committer votes.
Up to now, we have only 2 binding votes. Can one of