Thank you all! Closing the vote. The result will be sent in a separate
email.
Best,
Feng Jin
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 2:04 PM Hang Ruan wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Hang
>
> Jingsong Li 于2024年1月10日周三 12:03写道:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:24 AM Xuyang wrote:
> > >
> > >
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Hang
Jingsong Li 于2024年1月10日周三 12:03写道:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:24 AM Xuyang wrote:
> >
> > +1(non-binding)--
> >
> > Best!
> > Xuyang
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 在 2024-01-08 00:34:55,"Feng Jin" 写道:
> > >Hi Alexey
> > >
> > >Thank you for the reminder,
+1
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:24 AM Xuyang wrote:
>
> +1(non-binding)--
>
> Best!
> Xuyang
>
>
>
>
>
> 在 2024-01-08 00:34:55,"Feng Jin" 写道:
> >Hi Alexey
> >
> >Thank you for the reminder, the link has been updated.
> >
> >Best,
> >Feng Jin
> >
> >On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 12:55 AM Alexey Le
Hi Alexey
Thank you for the reminder, the link has been updated.
Best,
Feng Jin
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 12:55 AM Alexey Leonov-Vendrovskiy <
vendrov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for starting the vote!
> Do you mind adding a link from the FLIP to this thread?
>
> Thanks,
> Alexey
>
> On Thu, Jan
Thanks for starting the vote!
Do you mind adding a link from the FLIP to this thread?
Thanks,
Alexey
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 6:48 PM Feng Jin wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> Thanks for all the feedback about the FLIP-387: Support named parameters
> for functions and call procedures [1] [2] .
>
> I'd li
Thanks for the last minute change.
+1 (binding)
Cheers,
Timo
On 05.01.24 08:59, Feng Jin wrote:
Hi Timo,
Thank you for the suggestion. Previously, I thought most parameters were
optional, so the default value was set to true.
Your concern is reasonable. We should declare it as false by defa
Hi Timo,
Thank you for the suggestion. Previously, I thought most parameters were
optional, so the default value was set to true.
Your concern is reasonable. We should declare it as false by default and
developers should explicitly state if a parameter is optional instead of
using our default val
Thanks, for starting the VOTE thread and thanks for considering my
feedback. One last comment before I'm also happy to give my +1 to this:
Why is ArgumentHint's default isOptinal=true? Shouldn't it be false by
default? Many function implementers will forget to set this to false and
suddenly ge
+1 (binding)
Best,
Lincoln Lee
Benchao Li 于2024年1月5日周五 11:46写道:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Feng Jin 于2024年1月5日周五 10:49写道:
> >
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > Thanks for all the feedback about the FLIP-387: Support named parameters
> > for functions and call procedures [1] [2] .
> >
> > I'd like to start a vo
+1 (binding)
Feng Jin 于2024年1月5日周五 10:49写道:
>
> Hi everyone
>
> Thanks for all the feedback about the FLIP-387: Support named parameters
> for functions and call procedures [1] [2] .
>
> I'd like to start a vote for it. The vote will be open for at least 72
> hours(excluding weekends,until Jan 10
10 matches
Mail list logo