Re: Security fixes for Flink 1.18 (flink-shaded)

2024-02-02 Thread Jing Ge
Hi Hong, We were facing exactly the same guava issues and after analyzing those CVEs, we got the same conclusion as what Chesnay mentioned. Best regards, Jing On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 10:18 AM Chesnay Schepler wrote: > Guava CVEs don't apply because it's all about using it's createTempDir >

Re: Security fixes for Flink 1.18 (flink-shaded)

2024-02-02 Thread Chesnay Schepler
Guava CVEs don't apply because it's all about using it's createTempDir method which we don't use. Zookeeper CVE doesn't really apply because it's a server-side issue. On 02/02/2024 09:42, Martijn Visser wrote: To add to this: we can't upgrade to flink-shaded 18.0, since we've just reverted

Re: Security fixes for Flink 1.18 (flink-shaded)

2024-02-02 Thread Martijn Visser
To add to this: we can't upgrade to flink-shaded 18.0, since we've just reverted that for Flink 1.19 because of the performance regression. We will need a new flink-shaded version to deal with these performance regressions. On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 9:39 AM Martijn Visser wrote: > Hi Hong, > > I

Re: Security fixes for Flink 1.18 (flink-shaded)

2024-02-02 Thread Martijn Visser
Hi Hong, I do have objections: upgrading Flink-Shaded in a patch version is something that we should not take lightly, since it involves components that are used in the core functionality of Flink. We've seen in the past that changes in Flink Shaded have an impact on stability and performance. I

Security fixes for Flink 1.18 (flink-shaded)

2024-02-01 Thread Hong Liang
Hi all, Recently, we detected some active CVEs on the flink-shaded-guava and flink-shaded-zookeeper package used in Flink 1.18. Since Flink 1.18 is still in support for security fixes, we should consider fixing this. However, since the vulnerable package is coming from flink-shaded, I wanted to