Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6 (incubating) (RC2)

We could add the "apache" prefix for the release artifacts. As Stephan had mentioned, Robert, could you kindly send cancel vote email to the the RC2 vote thread by prefixing [CANCEL] in the subject line? This should help keep track of different RC vote threads to vote against. Thanks, - Henry

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6 (incubating) (RC2)

I vote to include the fix to FLINK-909 and create RC3.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6 (incubating) (RC2)

I would omit 'apache' just because that's what I see other Apache projects do. You're right that legal mentioned it would be best in this instance to show use of "Flink" alone as a trademark, and this helps that goal, although I think it's possible to achieve this otherwise. Yes in general though r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6 (incubating) (RC2)

I am not aware of any requirement that the jar have apache in the name. Alan. Ufuk Celebi August 8, 2014 at 1:39 AM I've changed my opinion. I thought about this further and think we should stick to the version *without* the prefix. The legal team asked for a r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6 (incubating) (RC2)

Hi Robert, No need for prefix IMHO, makes the names shorter and always assume Flink releases will be under ASF On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Robert Metzger wrote: > I think we should create another release candidate since Stephan provided a > fix for a crucial bug here: > https://github.com/a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6 (incubating) (RC2)

+1 to stick to the names without prefix. Most projects do it this way, and it makes names smaller, which is good. On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > > On 08 Aug 2014, at 09:38, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > > >> There is one additional issue I would like to discuss here: With this >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6 (incubating) (RC2)

On 08 Aug 2014, at 09:38, Ufuk Celebi wrote: >> There is one additional issue I would like to discuss here: With this >> release candidate, I've named the artifacts >> "apache-flink-0.6-incubating-rc2-src.tgz", my first RC had just >> "flink-0.6-incubating..", without the "apache-" prefix. >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6 (incubating) (RC2)

On 08 Aug 2014, at 09:36, Robert Metzger wrote: > I think we should create another release candidate since Stephan provided a > fix for a crucial bug here: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/91. I'm going to test his > changes and see if it fixes the error I reported. I will also

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6 (incubating) (RC2)

I think we should create another release candidate since Stephan provided a fix for a crucial bug here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/91. I'm going to test his changes and see if it fixes the error I reported. Also, we need to disable the POJO serialization, as it seems broken righ

[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6 (incubating) (RC2)

Hi All, Please vote on releasing the following artifacts as Apache Flink 0.6 incubating. This will be the first release for Flink since entering the Apache Incubator. The tag to be voted upon: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-flink.git;a=commit;h=c8585689 The artifacts to be