https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/agent/INFRA/issue/INFRA-11600
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Hari Shreedharan
wrote:
> No, github is not the primary scm. ASF git repos still are. But ASF
> does allow us to use github for reviews and such. Parquet, Spark etc
> have done it.
>
> On Th
No, github is not the primary scm. ASF git repos still are. But ASF
does allow us to use github for reviews and such. Parquet, Spark etc
have done it.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> The ASF allows github to be the primary scm? That is news to me. My
> understanding is th
The ASF allows github to be the primary scm? That is news to me. My
understanding is that projects have to use the ASFs git repo but you can pull
changes from the github mirror.
Ralph
> On Mar 19, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Hari Shreedharan
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have worked for a while on Spark
+1
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Johny Rufus John
wrote:
> +1. I have seen discussion on other projects contemplating on making this
> move.
>
> Thanks,
> Rufus
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Ashish wrote:
>
> > +1 for it. Let's try and see if it makes it easy to contribute.
> >
> > On
+1. I have seen discussion on other projects contemplating on making this
move.
Thanks,
Rufus
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Ashish wrote:
> +1 for it. Let's try and see if it makes it easy to contribute.
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Hari Shreedharan
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have
+1 for it. Let's try and see if it makes it easy to contribute.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Hari Shreedharan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have worked for a while on Spark recently, and like using github for
> scm. While not the best tool for code reviews, it certainly is better
> than using patches o
Hi,
I have worked for a while on Spark recently, and like using github for
scm. While not the best tool for code reviews, it certainly is better
than using patches on jiras. We already get a lot of review requests
as Pull Requests anyway. I'd like some community feedback on this.
I think we'd nee