[JIRA] Updated: (FOR-436) DTD for the status.xml file

2005-02-16 Thread issues
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Sjur N. Moshagen (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 1:44 AM Comment: Attached an archive of the two files that make up the DTD (status-v12.dtd and status-v12.mod). Changes: Attachment changed to status-v

Re[2]: Reusing legacy HTML

2005-02-16 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Hi Ross, >> RG> Stylesheets should be placed in the >> RG> {project:resources.stylesheets} >> RG> directory, only displayable content should be in the xdocs directory. >> >> Is this a must, does it cause functional problems. I knew about the >> stylesheet directory but decided not to fill it wi

[JIRA] Created: (FOR-436) DTD for the status.xml file

2005-02-16 Thread issues
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-436 Here is an overview of the issue: - Key

[JIRA] Created: (FOR-435) Wiki input files (*.jspwiki) is not correctly read when in UTF-8

2005-02-16 Thread issues
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-435 Here is an overview of the issue: - Key

Re: Reusing legacy HTML

2005-02-16 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: RG> Stylesheets should be placed in the RG> {project:resources.stylesheets} RG> directory, only displayable content should be in the xdocs directory. Is this a must, does it cause functional problems. I knew about the stylesheet directory but decided not to fill it with st

Re[2]: Reusing legacy HTML

2005-02-16 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Hi Ross, thanks for editing this. RG> That would be brilliant (don't forget we have a HowTo DTD). I was gonna use the HowTo for the second version. Since the first one if more of the general documentation type, I'd rather not use it there. RG> Actually this does not match because *.html will o

Re: Reusing legacy HTML

2005-02-16 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: So here it is. Your comments much appreciated before I format it for inclusion in the Forrest documention? I've moved to the dev list rather than the user list. The devs want to see this develop, the users want the final document. I was going to use document.dtd and write

[GUMP@brutus]: Project forrest-test (in module forrest) failed

2005-02-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project forrest-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects