Re: planning for 0.7 release

2005-02-25 Thread David Crossley
Dave Brondsema wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > >Ross Gardler wrote: > >>David Crossley wrote: > >> > >>>Should we aim for a release date of Friday 2005-03-25? > >> > >>SInce it's Nicola's birthday I think that is a must - two excuses for a > >>beer in the evening. > > > >Argh, that is Easter Frida

Re: planning for 0.7 release

2005-02-25 Thread Dave Brondsema
David Crossley wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: David Crossley wrote: Should we aim for a release date of Friday 2005-03-25? SInce it's Nicola's birthday I think that is a must - two excuses for a beer in the evening. Argh, that is Easter Friday. Probably many of us will be away, at least i will. +1 I p

Re: planning for 0.7 release

2005-02-25 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > >Should we aim for a release date of Friday 2005-03-25? > > SInce it's Nicola's birthday I think that is a must - two excuses for a > beer in the evening. Argh, that is Easter Friday. Probably many of us will be away, at least i will. I propose that

[JIRA] Commented: (FOR-227) static html site: index.html missing in links

2005-02-25 Thread issues
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Johannes Schaefer Created: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 8:36 AM Body: Let me make it explicit: ... ... Linking then from the XML-source like this Topic produces an html link . Results: * For jetty (read: 'forr

[JIRA] Commented: (FOR-227) static html site: index.html missing in links

2005-02-25 Thread issues
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Johannes Schaefer Created: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 8:23 AM Body: When I came up with this issue, I thought it's simply in file:// mode and that deplyoing a 'forrest site' with Apache web server would work fine. But then I reali

Re: [RT] Per document skinconf (was Re: coloring table cells [from the user list])

2005-02-25 Thread Ross Gardler
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: ... Meta-data is often processed independently of actual data. For example, a meta-data harvester is not interested in content. Of course, this would still be possible if it were all in the same file, but performance would

Re: Metadata in Forrest (was Re: [RT] Per document skinconf...)

2005-02-25 Thread Ross Gardler
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: ... All that being said, Forrest could be made to support both a separate file or embedded data (there are use cases where the simplistic solution is the best one). The problem with this is that we will have two locations fo

[Logs]

2005-02-25 Thread Cyriaque Dupoirieux
Hi, Can anyone tell me how I can set the DEBUG log level to see the logs of org.apache.forrest.util.IdGeneratorTransformer java class ? -- Cordialement, Cyriaque,

Metadata in Forrest (was Re: [RT] Per document skinconf...)

2005-02-25 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: ... All that being said, Forrest could be made to support both a separate file or embedded data (there are use cases where the simplistic solution is the best one). The problem with this is that we will have two locations for storing the same data -

Re: [RT] Per document skinconf (was Re: coloring table cells [from the user list])

2005-02-25 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Ross Gardler wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: ... Why not insert the metadata in the file itself like I proposed? I prefer to keep faith to the 1 file -> one output rule. I guess our different views here are because of different use cases. You seem to be assuming that you only ever want the meta-

Re: [HEADS-UP] We must use "build.sh test" (Re: trunk broken with recent i18n fixes (Was: svn commit: r154917))

2005-02-25 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Ross Gardler wrote: ... * Always run "built test" before committing * +*1* (means mee too) ... (I am one of the culprits who recently broke SVN head so I feel safe in saying this without offending anyone). +*1* (means

[HEADS-UP] We must use "build.sh test" (Re: trunk broken with recent i18n fixes (Was: svn commit: r154917))

2005-02-25 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: The problem is that not enough of us are working on the documentation, nor running 'build test'. So we do not see the issues immediately. Recently a number of changes have been made that worked in "forrest run" but not in "forrest site". We can easily avoid this by doing as D

[JIRA] Commented: (FOR-448) Faulty treatment of a-Elements in html-pipeline

2005-02-25 Thread issues
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Ferdinand Soethe Created: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 2:33 AM Body: Forget to add: The problems are already there when I request index.xml, so as Ross suggested it is likely an html2document.xsl issue. Ferdinand --