Tim Williams wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Tim Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > I think I grasped the TR. I didn't grasp that the scope of the
> > > current effort was implementing the entire TR. I thought we were only
> > > focused on the first part -- using XTHML2 as our source. I just
> > > d
> Can you bring a supply to the upcoming ApacheCon
> in San Diego? :-)
>
> That is only partially a joke. At least Ferdinand
> is going to be there, maybe more of us. It would be
> great to have other Forrest developers and users.
I live in San Diego :-) So I'm definitely going to be there (modul
On 9/8/05, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Williams wrote:
> >
> > I think I grasped the TR. I didn't grasp that the scope of the
> > current effort was implementing the entire TR. I thought we were only
> > focused on the first part -- using XTHML2 as our source. I just
> > didn
addi wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
> > > I also like cheches Interesting summary at:
> > > http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forrest/
> > >
> > > made me laugh.
> >
> > That is cool, I would like to highlight one of the random quotes as I
> > feel it is particularly important for the community:
> >
> > a
Tim Williams wrote:
>
> I think I grasped the TR. I didn't grasp that the scope of the
> current effort was implementing the entire TR. I thought we were only
> focused on the first part -- using XTHML2 as our source. I just
> didn't pick up on that earlier for some reason.
We are focussing on
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-655?page=comments#action_12322986 ]
David Crossley commented on FOR-655:
The xhtml2 document has been added to the new experimental plugin:
whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2 as
xhtml
On 9/8/05, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Williams wrote:
> > I'll read the rest of this later but really quickly I don't see how
> > moving the navi stuff out to a contract (which I agree with btw) is
> > going to solve my problem. It's not going to change that the internal
> > plu
On 9/8/05, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> why are we using views in the xhtml2 plugin?
This seems like an odd question. Because views are an integral part
of the TR? The plugin has turned into a next-gen forrest complete w/
new internal structure, refined views, integr
On Thursday September 08 2005 5:15 pm, Ross Gardler wrote:
> > I also like cheches Interesting summary at:
> > http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forrest/
> >
> > made me laugh.
>
> That is cool, I would like to highlight one of the random quotes as I
> feel it is particularly important for the community
Hi all,
why are we using views in the xhtml2 plugin?
--
thorsten
"Together we stand, divided we fall!"
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-669?page=all ]
David Crossley closed FOR-669:
--
Fix Version: 0.8-dev
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied, thanks.
> pelt view project logo not aligned correctly
>
Kevin wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>
> > Have a look on the beautiful mail of Diwaker and the log of cheche from
> > FT. I (tscherler or target{something}) talked with cheche what we have
> > to do to enable that.
>
> Sorry didn't understand that. Could you point me to the "homework" or an
>
The IRC log and Diwaker's summary are in SVN at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/forrest/events/forrest-tuesdays/
-David
Tim Williams wrote:
I'll read the rest of this later but really quickly I don't see how
moving the navi stuff out to a contract (which I agree with btw) is
going to solve my problem. It's not going to change that the internal
plugin xmap has match precedence over the menu.xmap.
I'm not sure e
I'll read the rest of this later but really quickly I don't see how
moving the navi stuff out to a contract (which I agree with btw) is
going to solve my problem. It's not going to change that the internal
plugin xmap has match precedence over the menu.xmap.
I've been thinking we were taking baby
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Please cross reference what Thorsten says in this part of this thread,
with my posting in the "xhtml2 tonights update & questions" [1] about
this match - it seems we agree on the approach, now we need to get the
details sorted, Thorsten makes a good start on the detail
David Crossley wrote:
The two example XHTML2 instances in that plugin now
validate (index.html and samples/xhtml2_subset.html).
WooHoo!
Thanks David.
Ross
Tim Williams wrote:
When you start reading these issues, it's not as bad as it sounds,
I've got an xhtml page "viewed" at this point, although it's really
ugly.
Great work Tim.
[WARING] I have *not* looked at your work in detail, so my comments may
be way off. If they are just say "check the
Tim Williams wrote:
Below is a short and long version of a trip through the view-related
pipelines. I certainly don't claim to understand every piece of it,
but this exercise has been useful for me to get a good detailed idea
of how views really work beyond the conceptual. My descriptions may
l
Gav wrote:
Diwaker, great summary and gives us all
an idea of what to do next and how to
catch up.
+1 - thanks for taking the time - this was *very* important.
I also like cheches Interesting summary at:
http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forrest/
made me laugh.
That is cool, I would li
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-669?page=all ]
kevin updated FOR-669:
--
Attachment: pelt.screen.css.diff
> pelt view project logo not aligned correctly
>
>
> Key: FOR-669
> URL: http://issues.
pelt view project logo not aligned correctly
Key: FOR-669
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-669
Project: Forrest
Type: Bug
Components: Views
Versions: 0.8-dev
Environment: Any
Reporter: kevin
At risk of keeping this going, I'll give my own thoughts on what
you've said. I've moved this out of the vote thread too.
>
> As well I want to take the opportunity for to make a statement.
>
> I did a senseless comment on the beg
Hello devs,
I counted
Positiv:
4 binding votes (+1) and 1 non-binding (+0)
Negativ:
2 negative none veto votes (-0) which have been binding votes.
That means we officially allow lenya committer to have write access to
our code base. They are *not* voted in as committer.
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 01:25 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...snip...
> > > > 2) Next I wanted to use my own css in that fv using so
> > > > in my xdocs/default.fv
> > > >
> > > > http://apache.org/forrest/templates/1.0"; >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
>
Tim Williams wrote:
> When you start reading these issues, it's not as bad as it sounds,
> I've got an xhtml page "viewed" at this point, although it's really
> ugly.
>
> Here's what I've done:
> o) Changed *.page to use a new pipeline **xhtmlbody-*.fhtml instead of
> the old **body-*.html
> o) Ch
| do
| rm whiteboard\plugins\org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2\src
| \documentation\content\xdocs\samples\xhtml2_subset.*
| svn up
|
| That should solve your problem.
|
| HTH
| --
| thorsten
Did that, had no effect.
I had a feeling and tried opening it up in Firefox 1 and Opera 8 and
N
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 20:10 +0800, Gav wrote:
> whiteboard\plugins\org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2\src\documentation\content\xdocs\samples\xhtml2_subset_old.xml
> ?
> whiteboard\plugins\org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2\src\documentation\content\xdocs\samples\xhtml2_subset.x
Still not working,
I did again in this order :-
1) svn up (rev 279554 now)
2) checked /main/webapp/WEB-INF/xconf/forrest-core.xconf making sure changes
were correct.
a) svn diff of forrest-core.xconf.diff says :-
Index: main/webapp/WEB-INF/xconf/forrest-core.xconf
===
:)
First of all good to have this fresh wind blowing in my face. ;-)
I really like having you on board.
[NOTE: I snipped the mail apart to fit my explanations and visions of
views]
[NOTE: I assume we are using jx for the forrest:structurer]
> Lon
UTF-8 encoded .ihtml documents gives garbled output
---
Key: FOR-668
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-668
Project: Forrest
Type: Bug
Versions: 0.7
Environment: PowerPC Linux/IBM j2se.1.4.2, x86 Lin
31 matches
Mail list logo
