One other thing that i want to add. I am concerned
that the running of the IRC sessions is being mainly
left to me. If it is always me that is co-ordinating,
reminding people that it is on, being the operator,
ensuring the logfiles, etc. then we have a weak point.
-David
Gav wrote:
> Replying to the original post, but I'll try and reply to other comments
> also.
Thanks Gav, we needed to hear from people like you.
I respond to some of your observations below.
Please don't take anything personally.
> Dirks summary of his notes says:-
>
> "...General dis
Ross Gardler wrote:
Brian M Dube wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Brian M Dube wrote:
I have seeded a plugin locally. I have some questions. Does this
master file need to validate?
If there is a DTD defined in the document then it must validate.
If so, does the plugin define the schema or doe
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Gav escribi??:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> > >
> > > Can we address the concern about the summaries?
> >
> > No single person should be responsible for the summaries as has been
> > mentioned. Having more than one person at the same time working on a summary
> > also
> -Original Message-
> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (well, if Australia can pull off a stormer today - curently 0-0)
>
> Ross
Bummer, and I stayed up for it.
It's an outrage
Gav...
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free E
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
El lun, 26-06-2006 a las 21:45 +0800, Gav escribió:
from Thorsten...
4. - During the session discussion is limited to the identified issues and
social chat. Anything else is deemed off topic and moved to the mailing
list.
Agreed. (woohoo, short answer)
Dunno
Gav wrote:
Replying to the original post, but I'll try and reply to other comments
also.
Thanks for your comments Gav. Very useful. I'm pulling a couple out for
further observations:
-Original Message-
From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Is it successful fo
El lun, 26-06-2006 a las 21:45 +0800, Gav escribió:
> Replying to the original post, but I'll try and reply to other comments
> also.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, 26 June 2006 2:00 PM
> > To: dev@forrest.apache.org
> > Su
Replying to the original post, but I'll try and reply to other comments
also.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 26 June 2006 2:00 PM
> To: dev@forrest.apache.org
> Subject: future of Forrest Friday get togethers
>
> (chair-hat=on ... no
Tim Williams wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >
> >Thorsten did try later on. However i suspect that it might
> >not have happened because you sent it to root rather than
> >to the specific people involved.
> >
> >Before i try, did you receive your cloaks?
>
> I have not. Thanks David.
Just got
Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
I really like the idea of shorter session on specific points (some
FOR to be resolved for instance).
It is worth noting that my suggestion was based on a discussion I had
with Paul (at least I think it was Paul) in the second or third Forrest
Friday. He works wit
On 6/26/06, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Tim Williams escribi??:
> > Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > > Thorsten Scherler escribi??:
> > > > David Crossley escribi??:
> > > > > Tim Williams wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I added my name to the pending list a wh
Hi,
As usual, the perception of Ross and David is very pertinent indeed.
I really like the idea of shorter session on specific points (some
FOR to be resolved for instance). (Maybe we will have time problems - I
mean between Europe and Australia :-P ?)
With this approach, we may bene
Thanks David for raising this. It has been on the back of my mind
(quite crowded with personal stuff atm) for a while.
And thanks Ross for your excellent analysis and the proposal.
I fully agree with your views and very much like the proposed
alternative.
-0 for having any more Fridays current st
David Crossley wrote:
...
It is now time to assess whether we want to continue.
I have been wanting to raise this issue for a while
The discussion at Incubator [2] spurred me.
Is it successful for us at Apache Forrest?
Success can be measured in two ways:
1) development progress
2) communit
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project forrest-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project forrest has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1 pr
17 matches
Mail list logo
