[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861253#action_12861253
]
David Crossley commented on FOR-644:
Yes that is correct. Just before release is the ideal
Tim Williams wrote:
>
> Well, if the dispatcher is all that changed in such a release, we
> could do a 0.91 afterwards. I think there's another consideration
> that I didn't mention too. I feel irresponsible releasing software
> that we can't support and I'm concerned that this would be the case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861070#action_12861070
]
Tim Williams commented on FOR-644:
--
It seems that this was done before the 0.8 release, is th
On 26/04/2010 13:14, Tim Williams wrote:
I think there's another consideration
that I didn't mention too. I feel irresponsible releasing software
that we can't support and I'm concerned that this would be the case
with the dispatcher.
This is a valid comment and one the Forrest committers sho
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Cyriaque Dupoirieux
wrote:
> le 22/04/2010 12:24 Ross Gardler a écrit :
>> On 22/04/2010 00:54, Tim Williams wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:38 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Tim Williams w
le 22/04/2010 12:24 Ross Gardler a écrit :
> On 22/04/2010 00:54, Tim Williams wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:38 PM, David Crossley wrote:
>>>
Tim Williams wrote:
> reason I ask, is that we have
