Re: Javascript mime type

2013-01-24 Thread Sjur Moshagen
Den 24. jan 2013 kl. 22:33 skrev Tim Williams: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Tim Williams wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Sjur Moshagen wrote: >>> According to this page: >>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4101394/javascript-mime-type >>> and many others on the net, applicat

Re: Javascript mime type

2013-01-24 Thread Tim Williams
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Tim Williams wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Sjur Moshagen wrote: >> According to this page: >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4101394/javascript-mime-type >> and many others on the net, application/javascript is the correct answer, >> but not acce

Re: Javascript mime type

2013-01-24 Thread Tim Williams
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Sjur Moshagen wrote: > According to this page: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4101394/javascript-mime-type > and many others on the net, application/javascript is the correct answer, but > not accepted by MS IE ≤ 8. Which leaves us with text/javascript. But

Re: Javascript mime type

2013-01-24 Thread Sjur Moshagen
According to this page: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4101394/javascript-mime-type and many others on the net, application/javascript is the correct answer, but not accepted by MS IE ≤ 8. Which leaves us with text/javascript. But several places (including the above) argues that leaving it e