Hi,
I think - like Ross - than Views are a very clean solution to many
things.
My main problem with skins is exactly what you said :
* Source code may be duplicated depending on where it is used,
* Granularty is complex problem which do not interest skins. The
result is that w
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 14:37 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...
So I was going to ask you to write a simple How-To on
creating a new contract, and then embedding it in my own site.
Yeah I can understand that. Did you see
whiteboard/plugins/
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 14:37 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > hello devs,
> >
> > I just work on the i18n integration for pelt and crossed again the whys
> > for using views. ;-)
>
> This mail makes for a pretty good piece of documentation.
>
:) It explains a wee bit bet
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
hello devs,
I just work on the i18n integration for pelt and crossed again the whys
for using views. ;-)
This mail makes for a pretty good piece of documentation.
A number of times over the last couple of weeks I have wanted to write a
mail asking you to write some u
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 21:03 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> > Yes that would be great. :) That could be the 'last-published-net'
> > contract.
>
> Its funny, I chose the *exact* same name even before I wrote my first mail :)
>
lol :)
Yeah, once started working with views and contracts the naming
> Yes that would be great. :) That could be the 'last-published-net'
> contract.
Its funny, I chose the *exact* same name even before I wrote my first mail :)
Anyways, I'm attaching last-published-net.ft. It uses an improved
version of the XSL date service (no Perl script!). In addition, if a
net
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 19:04 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> On 6/4/05, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I had to extend the default.fv with a new line:
> >
> > to activate the new contract in any place of the output that I want.
As
> > well it is possible to place the contract a
On 6/4/05, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had to extend the default.fv with a new line:
>
> to activate the new contract in any place of the output that I want. As
> well it is possible to place the contract as much as I want.
>
> Refactoring site2xhtml.xsl has similarities o
hello devs,
I just work on the i18n integration for pelt and crossed again the whys
for using views. ;-)
The case is that the site2xhtml.xsl has a lot of repeating code. For
example the "last publish"-contract can be found 2 times in the code:
@@ -236,9 +241,9 @@
+
|end Endtabs
+
-
