On Saturday 30 July 2005 9:21 pm, David Crossley wrote:
However, we do need to discuss the Wiki issue as part
of the broader documentation effort. So thanks for
raising it again. Someone should find the link to
the old discussion.
I believe this is the link:
I understand Diwaker's unhappiness about our mailing lists as one
major source of permanent information and believe that it would help
to find an easy way of extracting important parts of on-list discussions
into some kind of structured system.
However in my view this would require somebody
Diwaker Gupta wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2005 9:21 pm, David Crossley wrote:
However, we do need to discuss the Wiki issue as part
of the broader documentation effort. So thanks for
raising it again. Someone should find the link to
the old discussion.
I believe this is the link:
A lot of Apache projects have their Wiki hosted at
http://wiki.apache.org/general/. I think we *really* need a Wiki right now
for Forrest, for the following reasons:
o turn around time for making small documentation changes on the Forrest
website is high
o a Wiki will give chance to Forrest
Diwaker Gupta wrote:
A lot of Apache projects have their Wiki hosted at
http://wiki.apache.org/general/. I think we *really* need a Wiki right now
for Forrest, for the following reasons:
Not so fast. We have discussed this recently in the
mail archives. The decision was not to do it because
