Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
>
> OK, since we all seem to agree on this I will write some piece for the
> updated docs next week and leave the changes.
Every major change should also be listed in
site-author/status.xml file. A brief note would
suffice and link to other info, such as the updating_*.htm
OK, since we all seem to agree on this I will write some piece for the
updated docs next week and leave the changes.
--
Ferdinand Soethe
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 06:22 -0400, addi wrote:
> On Friday October 07 2005 3:06 am, Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
> > Ross Gardler wrote:
> > > One of our community has raised a concern,
> > > we have to address it. In this case I feel the call is yours as to
> > > whether the changes stay or not (others
On Friday October 07 2005 3:06 am, Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
> > One of our community has raised a concern,
> > we have to address it. In this case I feel the call is yours as to
> > whether the changes stay or not (others will speak up if they have an
> > opinion).
>
> Yes 'oth
Ross Gardler wrote:
> One of our community has raised a concern,
> we have to address it. In this case I feel the call is yours as to
> whether the changes stay or not (others will speak up if they have an
> opinion).
Yes 'others' please do!
Problem is the interpretation of bugs and features
