David Crossley wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> > > David Crossley wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps the Ant target "deploy" target, that makes
> > > > the plugin available for download, does not pack
> > > > the built jar into the zip file.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again for
Ross Gardler wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >There are various other such plugins, but no developer
> >is asking for them to be deployed. The trouble is that
> >if we don't deploy these, then people will get strange
> >errors when they try and we will need to answer lots
> >of mail lists question
Gav wrote:
>
> Yep, Dispatcher does a forrest run and forrest ok for me too in trunk.
> I still get my ant test fail however. I tried to ant test the glossary
> plugin in trunk and that fails too, missing a todo.xml file.
>
> I am using forests own packaged Ant.
This is the same as issue
htt
David Crossley wrote:
There are various other such plugins, but no developer
is asking for them to be deployed. The trouble is that
if we don't deploy these, then people will get strange
errors when they try and we will need to answer lots
of mail lists questions. I know that there are warnings a
David Crossley wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> > >
> > > Perhaps the Ant target "deploy" target, that makes
> > > the plugin available for download, does not pack
> > > the built jar into the zip file.
> > >
> > > Thanks again for your valuable input.
> >
> > Yep this
Gav wrote:
-Original Message-
From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 13 April 2007 12:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source
David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Brian M Dube wrote:
The same steps produce
David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Brian M Dube wrote:
The same steps produce the same error on Linux. However, it appears the
scope is not limited to the dispatcher. Any plugin that provides Java
source will fail. Plugins in trunk are built in $FOO_PLUGIN/build
David Crossley wrote:
Brian M Dube wrote:
The same steps produce the same error on Linux. However, it appears the
scope is not limited to the dispatcher. Any plugin that provides Java
source will fail. Plugins in trunk are built in $FOO_PLUGIN/build, where
the compiled code will end up. This i
> -Original Message-
> From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 13 April 2007 12:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source
>
> David Crossley wrote:
> > David Crossley wrot
David Crossley wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Brian M Dube wrote:
> > >
> > > The same steps produce the same error on Linux. However, it appears the
> > > scope is not limited to the dispatcher. Any plugin that provides Java
> > > source will fail. Plugins in trunk are built in $FOO_PLUGIN/
David Crossley wrote:
> Brian M Dube wrote:
> >
> > The same steps produce the same error on Linux. However, it appears the
> > scope is not limited to the dispatcher. Any plugin that provides Java
> > source will fail. Plugins in trunk are built in $FOO_PLUGIN/build, where
> > the compiled cod
Brian M Dube wrote:
>
> The same steps produce the same error on Linux. However, it appears the
> scope is not limited to the dispatcher. Any plugin that provides Java
> source will fail. Plugins in trunk are built in $FOO_PLUGIN/build, where
> the compiled code will end up. This is not the cas
Ross Gardler wrote:
Gav wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 April 2007 6:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RC1 Fails on dispatcher (Re: calling all developers, test
release
candidate)
Ross Gardler wrote:
Olivier Parent wr
13 matches
Mail list logo
