Re: Solving FOR-470 and getting rid of xdocs now?

2005-05-18 Thread Ross Gardler
Juan Jose Pablos wrote: On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:06 +0200, Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Looking at the details, I keep wondering if it wouldn't save us much work to get rid of x-docs and fix FOR-470 in one step. In order to get rid of x-docs, we need to create the stylesheet for xdocs --> xhtml so, I

Re: Solving FOR-470 and getting rid of xdocs now?

2005-05-17 Thread Juan Jose Pablos
> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:06 +0200, Ferdinand Soethe wrote: >Looking at the details, I keep wondering if it wouldn't save us much >work to get rid of x-docs and fix FOR-470 in one step. In order to get rid of x-docs, we need to create the stylesheet for xdocs --> xhtml so, I recond that this nee

Re: Solving FOR-470 and getting rid of xdocs now?

2005-05-17 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
I just realized that this will also involve changing the documentation and plugin sites and that is more than I'm able to do properly before the .7-release. So I'll withdraw my proposal and just fix FOR-470. Ferdinand

Re: Solving FOR-470 and getting rid of xdocs now?

2005-05-17 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:06 +0200, Ferdinand Soethe wrote: > I've started looking into FOR-470. > > Looking at the details, I keep wondering if it wouldn't save us much > work to get rid of x-docs and fix FOR-470 in one step. > > If we don't I'd change all the wording for raw-files to 'xdocs' now