Brian M Dube wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:44:13PM +1100, David Crossley wrote:
> > Brian M Dube wrote:
> > > The Jing discussion reminded me of upgrading Batik. We currently
> > > package batik-all-1.6.jar. Batik 1.7 does not ship an -all jar. Did
> > >
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:44:13PM +1100, David Crossley wrote:
> Brian M Dube wrote:
> > The Jing discussion reminded me of upgrading Batik. We currently
> > package batik-all-1.6.jar. Batik 1.7 does not ship an -all jar. Did
> > Cocoon or Forrest build a custom jar out of t
Brian M Dube wrote:
> The Jing discussion reminded me of upgrading Batik. We currently
> package batik-all-1.6.jar. Batik 1.7 does not ship an -all jar. Did
> Cocoon or Forrest build a custom jar out of the modules that Batik
> ships?
Forrest would have obtained that as-is from Cocoon
The Jing discussion reminded me of upgrading Batik. We currently
package batik-all-1.6.jar. Batik 1.7 does not ship an -all jar. Did
Cocoon or Forrest build a custom jar out of the modules that Batik
ships?
-Brian