Re: Which pipeline to intercept for Search

2006-03-18 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
> Do you mean main/webapp/search.xmap line 105 Yeah, right. Time to take off those dark sunglasses :-) Thanks, -- Ferdinand Soethe

Re: Which pipeline to intercept for Search

2006-03-18 Thread David Crossley
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > There is already a way to get a list of all > > files in the site. > > > localhost:/linkmap.{xml|html} > > > This is generated from site.xml > > That one I know. But wouldn't there have to be another pipeline that > processes documents f

Re: Which pipeline to intercept for Search

2006-03-17 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
David Crossley wrote: > There is already a way to get a list of all > files in the site. > localhost:/linkmap.{xml|html} > This is generated from site.xml That one I know. But wouldn't there have to be another pipeline that processes documents for the lucene search? That's the one I was a

Re: Which pipeline to intercept for Search

2006-03-17 Thread David Crossley
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: > > Thanks Tim, I didn't realize it was that easy to aggregate them but > that looks like it would work. Such is the power of Cocoon. > Although: where would I find the data for the pathname of the file? > The way I understand the example it will give me an xml-stream of

Re: Which pipeline to intercept for Search

2006-03-17 Thread David Crossley
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: > > Great. Didn't realize cocoon docs had become so good. Should have > checked first. Thanks, Tim. In general these are old docs. They haven't updated in ages. Cocoon docs are an underutilised goldmine. We try to refer people to it from Forrest, but often developers don'

Re: Which pipeline to intercept for Search

2006-03-17 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Great. Didn't realize cocoon docs had become so good. Should have checked first. Thanks, Tim. -- Ferdinand Soethe

Re: Which pipeline to intercept for Search

2006-03-17 Thread Tim Williams
On 3/17/06, Ferdinand Soethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Tim, I didn't realize it was that easy to aggregate them but > that looks like it would work. > > Although: where would I find the data for the pathname of the file? > The way I understand the example it will give me an xml-stream o

Re: Which pipeline to intercept for Search

2006-03-17 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Thanks Tim, I didn't realize it was that easy to aggregate them but that looks like it would work. Although: where would I find the data for the pathname of the file? The way I understand the example it will give me an xml-stream of the titles of all files in all directories -- Ferdinand Soethe

Re: Which pipeline to intercept for Search

2006-03-17 Thread Tim Williams
On 3/17/06, Ferdinand Soethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've build a JS-based title search mechanism that works for Forrest in > dynamic and static mode. It requires a page with a list of all page titles > of the current site which in my application is generated outside of > Forrest. > > Now I

Which pipeline to intercept for Search

2006-03-17 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
I've build a JS-based title search mechanism that works for Forrest in dynamic and static mode. It requires a page with a list of all page titles of the current site which in my application is generated outside of Forrest. Now I would like to make Forrest 0.7 build this list. What would be the pi