Tim Williams wrote:
> Sorry, I should have put my opinion in while I had the opportunity in
> your other thread on this. I think that moving some of these is good,
> but not all. For example, the extparser transformer doesn't seem to
> be used elsewhere so it makes sense to me to only have it def
Tim Williams wrote:
> Sorry, I should have put my opinion in while I had the opportunity in
> your other thread on this. I think that moving some of these is good,
> but not all. For example, the extparser transformer doesn't seem to
> be used elsewhere so it makes sense to me to only have it d
Sorry, I should have put my opinion in while I had the opportunity in
your other thread on this. I think that moving some of these is good,
but not all. For example, the extparser transformer doesn't seem to
be used elsewhere so it makes sense to me to only have it defined in
forrest.xmap. That
