Seems this was forgotten. Do you plan to do it?
Monday, January 8, 2018, 11:04:31 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Thanks Daniel, > > That's a good news. I did not want to get further with > try.freemarker.org waiting for this to happen. Once LetsEncrypt setting is > done a redirection > should be enough > > Jacques > > Le 08/01/2018 à 09:47, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> Greg commented on the request: >> >> try.freemarker.apache.org now works, and is propagated. >> >> Since that hostname maps to your VM, the certificate to be used for >> try.freemarker.apache.org will need to be hosted/operated by your VM. >> Infra's current policy for project VMs is to use LetsEncrypt for >> certificates. [~pono] will get you set up with that. >> >> >> Wednesday, January 3, 2018, 11:34:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>> Good, Greg closed INFRA-15476 >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> Le 03/01/2018 à 21:23, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>>> I'm "a bit" late with this, but I have created the issue for it: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/agent/INFRA/issue/INFRA-15775 >>>> >>>> >>>> Friday, December 15, 2017, 1:57:04 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >>>> >>>>> To summarize, the opininos were (whether we should switch to >>>>> try.freemarker.apache.org): >>>>> - Daniel Dekany: We better not risk not doing this >>>>> - Jacopo Cappellato: Agrees with me (above) in this >>>>> - Jacques Le Roux: No opinion was expressed, but it's technically fine >>>>> - Ralph Goers: It's certainly not necessary to do >>>>> >>>>> So, unless someone has more to add, I will ask this from Infra in the >>>>> coming days... just to be on the safe side. >>>>> >>>>> Wednesday, November 29, 2017, 6:38:05 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The difference is that try.freemarker.org >>>>>> <http://try.freemarker.org/> is a companion site. So long as the >>>>>> main site is freemarker.apache.org I don’t think anyone will complain >>>>>> about a companion site. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ralph >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:33 AM, Jacques Le Roux >>>>>>> <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Ralph, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> IIRW openoffice.org is an exception. There are others, when the domain >>>>>>> was well established before entering the incubator, subversion.org >>>>>>> comes to mind. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> IMO freemarker.org was well established before entering the incubator >>>>>>> but not try.freemarker.apache.org which is quite recent. Hence maybe >>>>>>> some caution needed... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My 2 cts >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 29/11/2017 à 14:55, Ralph Goers a écrit : >>>>>>>> Personally, I don’t see why there should be a problem as long as >>>>>>>> try.freemarker.org <http://try.freemarker.org/> is an Apache >>>>>>>> controlled domain. You aren’t the only project that has a vanity >>>>>>>> domain. See www.openoffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org/> as an >>>>>>>> example. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ralph >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 1:51 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just as a reminder, I'm planning to request try.freemarker.apache.org, >>>>>>>>> from Infra and then redirect try.freemarker.org to it, because I'm >>>>>>>>> worried that the IPMC will dislike that we use try.freemarker.org as >>>>>>>>> the canonical address of the online template tester. It will also use >>>>>>>>> https and a LetsEncrypt certificate (we can't use the *.apache.org >>>>>>>>> cert on a VM). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BTW, using a sub-sub domains is a bit extreme. I'm not aware of any >>>>>>>>> gotchas in out case, but if anyone is aware some, like LetsEncrypt >>>>>>>>> doesn't support them or something, please stop me! (Also, as this way >>>>>>>>> we will receive the cookies of freemarker.apache.org, but certainly we >>>>>>>>> will able to cope with that, if it ever causes a problem.) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any comments? And do you (especially PPMC members) agree? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Daniel Dekany >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> > > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
