Re: PPMC members, please check our January Poddling Report!

2017-01-03 Thread Daniel Dekany
At least now it stars the editor when I press Edit. Wednesday, January 4, 2017, 7:26:55 AM, David E Jones wrote: > On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 10:26 +0100, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> I have added our report to >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017. PPMC members, please >> read it, and sign it

Re: PPMC members, please check our January Poddling Report!

2017-01-03 Thread David E Jones
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 10:26 +0100, Daniel Dekany wrote: > I have added our report to > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017. PPMC members, please > read it, and sign it off if you agree! > The report looks good. I tried signing it through the wiki but the page is showing as 'Immutable P

Re: About a Freemarker template evaluator service

2017-01-03 Thread Christoph Rüger
+1 watch out for security / template injection attacks: e.g. see http://blog.portswigger.net/2015/08/server-side-template-injection.html set configuration.setNewBuiltinClassResolver(TemplateClassResolver. ALLOWS_NOTHING_RESOLVER); 2017-01-03 16:07 GMT+01:00 Taher Alkhateeb : > Very cool idea,

Re: About a Freemarker template evaluator service

2017-01-03 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
Very cool idea, and I think in worst case scenario not too difficult to redo the work if needed. It's just one page that calls the parser. On Jan 3, 2017 3:27 PM, "Daniel Dekany" wrote: > Probably there will be a higher chance for positive answer if we can > offer running the service too. Becaus

Re: [DRAFT] FreeMarker report - January 2017

2017-01-03 Thread Daniel Dekany
Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 9:39:14 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > It would be also great if any of you could write a short summary (i.e. a > sentence or two) of the changes to the codebase we did in the last quarter > and add it to the section "How has the project developed since the last > report?

Re: About a Freemarker template evaluator service

2017-01-03 Thread Daniel Dekany
Probably there will be a higher chance for positive answer if we can offer running the service too. Because I guess that's a burden for them, while owning a piece of software on GitHub is not, that's just good PR. Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 12:53:12 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Le 03/01/2017 à 09

Re: About a Freemarker template evaluator service

2017-01-03 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 03/01/2017 à 09:32, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : Hi all, a couple of days ago Daniel brought to my attention the site/service: http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/ They provide a nice online tool to evaluate any Freemarker template by providing the template code and its context. Wouldn't b

Re: PPMC members, please check our January Poddling Report!

2017-01-03 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Signed off! Thank you Jacopo On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > I have added our report to > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017. PPMC members, please > read it, and sign it off if you agree! > > > Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 8:53:12 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >

PPMC members, please check our January Poddling Report!

2017-01-03 Thread Daniel Dekany
I have added our report to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017. PPMC members, please read it, and sign it off if you agree! Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 8:53:12 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > >> >> Is there any "political" reason for

Re: [DRAFT] FreeMarker report - January 2017

2017-01-03 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
It would be also great if any of you could write a short summary (i.e. a sentence or two) of the changes to the codebase we did in the last quarter and add it to the section "How has the project developed since the last report?" Jacopo On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.ca

About a Freemarker template evaluator service

2017-01-03 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi all, a couple of days ago Daniel brought to my attention the site/service: http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/ They provide a nice online tool to evaluate any Freemarker template by providing the template code and its context. Wouldn't be nice is we could offer that or a similar service to