Tuesday, November 14, 2017, 12:49:12 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> It looks like you only fixed one of them.
Ugh... fixed that too.
> Ralph
>
>> On Nov 13, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, fixed.
>>
>>
>> Monday, November 13, 2017, 5:13:47 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>>> Aggree
It looks like you only fixed one of them.
Ralph
> On Nov 13, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>
> Thanks, fixed.
>
>
> Monday, November 13, 2017, 5:13:47 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> Aggreement s/b Agreement.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 13, 2017, at 1:55 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>
Thanks, fixed.
Monday, November 13, 2017, 5:13:47 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Aggreement s/b Agreement.
>
> Ralph
>
>
>> On Nov 13, 2017, at 1:55 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>
>> I have added a such statement to the README.md now:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/
>>
>> Regarding
Aggreement s/b Agreement.
Ralph
> On Nov 13, 2017, at 1:55 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>
> I have added a such statement to the README.md now:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/
>
> Regarding pull request on Github
>
> By sending a pull request you grant the Apache Software Fou
Sounds fair and enough to me
Jacques
Le 13/11/2017 à 09:55, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
I have added a such statement to the README.md now:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/
Regarding pull request on Github
By sending a pull request you grant the Apache Software Foundation
I have added a such statement to the README.md now:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/
Regarding pull request on Github
By sending a pull request you grant the Apache Software Foundation
sufficient rights to use and release the submitted work under the
Apache license. You gra
Thanks Ralph,
That indeed goes the same way than when we had a check box for that in Jira (I
can't remember why it was abandoned)
Jacques
Le 13/11/2017 à 00:36, Ralph Goers a écrit :
An ICLA is always encouraged but is not required if the committer knows for
certain the contributor intends
An ICLA is always encouraged but is not required if the committer knows for
certain the contributor intends for their contribution to be Apache licensed.
Simply having a statement in the main README at GitHub with a statement to the
effect that all contributions submitted as pull requests are un
Le 12/11/2017 à 11:29, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
Sunday, November 12, 2017, 9:49:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I agree, I'm just unsure a contributor needs an ICLA for medium
contributions, ie a bit more than fixing typos, like fixing obvious simple bugs.
When something affects the Ja
Sunday, November 12, 2017, 9:49:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I agree, I'm just unsure a contributor needs an ICLA for medium
> contributions, ie a bit more than fixing typos, like fixing obvious simple
> bugs.
When something affects the Java code inside freemarker.jar... I just
Hi Daniel,
I agree, I'm just unsure a contributor needs an ICLA for medium contributions,
ie a bit more than fixing typos, like fixing obvious simple bugs.
Anyway that's purely theoretical, since it's something we can bypass for
specific cases, right?
BTW I did not find for sure the discussio
Months ago we had discussion here about when an ICLA or CCLA is needed for
merging Girhub PR. To reflect that, I have updated this part:
https://freemarker.apache.org/committer-howto.html#merging-pull-request
Do you agree? Especially if you are PPMC, it would be good if you
answer.
Also, the lef
12 matches
Mail list logo
