Thanks,
please, let me know if you need help.
Regards
JB
On 13/09/2018 07:43, Manu Zhang wrote:
> Thanks everyone for sharing your thoughts. It seems we've reached an
> consensus.
> I'm going to start a formal vote thread and please cast your vote there.
>
> Thanks,
> Manu
>
>
>
>
>
> On W
Thanks everyone for sharing your thoughts. It seems we've reached an
consensus.
I'm going to start a formal vote thread and please cast your vote there.
Thanks,
Manu
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:22 PM Karol Brejna wrote:
> Manu,
>
> Thanks for bringing this difficult topic.
>
> I was strugglin
Manu,
Thanks for bringing this difficult topic.
I was struggling with it myself.
Here are my thoughts:
Our main objectives were to build the community and gain more adoption.
Although there was some considerable interest, I think we were not able to
build a stable and sizable community around
I think it also should be considered since it never really got traction as a
beam runner or within alpakka. For alpakka the concept of alternative
ActorMaterializer's was never really fully embraced. I think it came very close
to getting community traction but lost its core group of people driv
Hi Manu,
unfortunately, even if I think Gearpump is a very interesting project, I
think we don't have a large community around.
Especially, the dev activity is low, and I agree with you that
retirement should be considered.
Regards
JB
On 09/09/2018 09:37, Manu Zhang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Gearpu
Hi all,
Gearpump has been an Apache incubator since 2016-03-08. Thank you all for
help to incubate Gearpump and keep it move forward.
The activity around Gearpump has, however, slowed down and the last release
was more than one year ago. There is no sign of a growing community, which
is a requir
