Re: [DISCUSS] Add GEODE-7261 and GEODE-7241 to release/1.9.2

2019-10-14 Thread Jens Deppe
Thank you for the approvals. I will include these changes in 1.9.2 --Jens On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:21 AM John Blum wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:19 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > > +1 to including both. > > > > On 10/14/19 10:52 AM, Dick Cavender wrote: > > > +1 for both fixes and

Re: [DISCUSS] Support For LTS Version Of Geode

2019-10-14 Thread Anthony Baker
I think LTS implies a lot of things I’m not sure about yet. I suggest we keep the 1.9.x release line going to help “Spring Data for Apache Geode” on an as needed basis and see how it goes. Anthony > On Sep 30, 2019, at 6:32 PM, John Blum wrote: > > 1 more thing... > > I am also not saying

Re: [DISCUSS] Add GEODE-7261 and GEODE-7241 to release/1.9.2

2019-10-14 Thread John Blum
+1 On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:19 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > +1 to including both. > > On 10/14/19 10:52 AM, Dick Cavender wrote: > > +1 for both fixes and the original list > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:00 PM Owen Nichols wrote: > > > >> Sounds like a big win for convenience, and clearly

Re: [DISCUSS] Add GEODE-7261 and GEODE-7241 to release/1.9.2

2019-10-14 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
+1 to including both. On 10/14/19 10:52 AM, Dick Cavender wrote: +1 for both fixes and the original list On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:00 PM Owen Nichols wrote: Sounds like a big win for convenience, and clearly a regression relative to the last release of Geode that SBDG picked up (1.6).

Re: [DISCUSS] Add GEODE-7261 and GEODE-7241 to release/1.9.2

2019-10-14 Thread Dick Cavender
+1 for both fixes and the original list On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:00 PM Owen Nichols wrote: > Sounds like a big win for convenience, and clearly a regression relative > to the last release of Geode that SBDG picked up (1.6). Thanks for > clarifying what is at stake. > > +1 for including both