This is amazing!
> On Oct 12, 2021, at 3:37 PM, Dale Emery wrote:
>
> In September 2021, Geode added support for writing and running tests using
> JUnit 5.
>
> Most Geode modules now support JUnit 5. For most Geode modules, you can now
> write each test class using either JUnit 5's "Jupiter"
In September 2021, Geode added support for writing and running tests using
JUnit 5.
Most Geode modules now support JUnit 5. For most Geode modules, you can now
write each test class using either JUnit 5's "Jupiter" API or the legacy JUnit
4 API.
Which modules support JUnit 5? Any source set th
I would not call it a “surge” of them, but I perceived an uptick in them.
From: Udo Kohlmeyer
Date: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 1:00 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geode-9621: Spotless overstepping its boundary of formatter
I had never explicitly asked this, but what was the main driv
I had never explicitly asked this, but what was the main driver for this
ticket? Was there a surge in explicit version definitions in gradle files? I
mean we as committers have agreed to using BOM constraints.
--Udo
From: Robert Houghton
Date: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 at 4:32 AM
To: dev@geo
Again, Spotless is not changing code. That was a bad change, as you pointed
out, and we modified Spotless to throw an exception instead of stripping out
the version string indiscriminately.
We surely could make Spotless only apply to the main source set. The cost would
be that tests could use d
I think maybe a better option might be to use a lock for the cluster
configuration. We can make the request to get the cluster config wait until the
update to the cluster config is completely applied. Maybe we already have a
lock to force cluster configuration updates to happen one at a time?
-
>The formatter now throws when there is a naked version-string on the
>dependency line, as we discussed.
This new behavior seems reasonable to me. And I think this is what you are
asking for, Udo? I do agree that spotlessApply shouldn't change any behavior
and cause someone to lose part of thei
The new ticket is opened.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9718
There are two proposals on the ticket, so it should be decided in which way we
should go.
BR,
Mario
Šalje: Udo Kohlmeyer
Poslano: 12. listopada 2021. 0:59
Prima: dev@geode.apache.org
Pre
