Feedback seems to be positive, I'll go ahead and merge this. I'll create a
separate PR to split out memcached - I think that is a good idea.
Thanks!
-Dan
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:56 PM Anilkumar Gingade
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:32 PM John Blum wrote:
>
> > Definitely a reason
+1
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:32 PM John Blum wrote:
> Definitely a reasonable change. Perhaps, for consistency sake, the same
> should be applied to Geode's Memcached support? (in another PR).
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 4:23 PM Dan Smith wrote:
>
> > I created a PR to move our redis support
Definitely a reasonable change. Perhaps, for consistency sake, the same
should be applied to Geode's Memcached support? (in another PR).
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 4:23 PM Dan Smith wrote:
> I created a PR to move our redis support to a separate module. Let me know
> what you think:
>
> https://g
I created a PR to move our redis support to a separate module. Let me know
what you think:
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/3284
Geode servers will still include redis on the classpath, so the only effect
of this is that if you are launching a server based on the maven
dependencies, you will
