I have created the release branch "release/1.1.0". Please look at this and
raise if there is any issue.
If there is no concern then we will start voting next week.
Thanks.Hitesh
I'd like to merge into 1.1.0 the change to the Host test class that I
checked into develop today. It's breaking things for some people, so it
would be nice to have in the 1.1.0 branch.
Le 1/27/2017 à 11:00 AM, Hitesh Khamesra a écrit :
I have created the release branch "release/1.1.0". Please
Sure. Lets include GEODE-2368 (Need to fix log message in DirectChannel) this
as well.
Thanks.Hitesh
From: Bruce Schuchardt
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release branch for 1.1.0
I'd like to merge into 1.1.0 the chan
37 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release branch for 1.1.0
I'd like to merge into 1.1.0 the change to the Host test class that I
checked into develop today. It's breaking things for some people, so it
would be nice to have in the 1.1.0 branch.
Le 1/27/2017 à 11:00 AM, Hitesh Khamesra a
ry 30, 2017 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release branch for 1.1.0
I'd like to merge into 1.1.0 the change to the Host test class that I
checked into develop today. It's breaking things for some people, so it
would be nice to have in the 1.1.0 branch.
Le 1/27/2017 à 11:00 AM, Hi
Thanks Bruce. There is one more ticket GEODE-2386, which Kirk is looking into
it.
-Hitesh
From: Bruce Schuchardt
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release branch for 1.1.0
I'm done merging these two changes to release/
: [DISCUSS] Release branch for 1.1.0
Thanks Bruce. There is one more ticket GEODE-2386, which Kirk is looking into
it.
-Hitesh
From: Bruce Schuchardt
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release branch for 1.1.0
I'm done me
m: Hitesh Khamesra
> To: "dev@geode.apache.org"
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 2:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release branch for 1.1.0
>
> Thanks Bruce. There is one more ticket GEODE-2386, which Kirk is looking into
> it.
> -Hitesh
>
>
> From: Bruce Schucha
ore fixes.
> > GEODE-2386 Unable to launch dunit VMs in nightly builds
> > GEODE-2247 GFSH over HTTP succeeds without authentication
> > Thanks,Hitesh
> >
> >
> > From: Hitesh Khamesra
> > To: "dev@geode.apache.org"
> > Sent: Monday, Ja
I have updated the release notes. Please verify and update it.
Thanks,Hitesh
From: Anthony Baker
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release branch for 1.1.0
While we’re finalizing the last fixes, let’s crowd-source the release
86 Unable to launch dunit VMs in nightly builds
>>> GEODE-2247 GFSH over HTTP succeeds without authentication
>>> Thanks,Hitesh
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Hitesh Khamesra
>>> To: "dev@geode.apache.org"
>>> Sent: Monday, January 3
gt;>>
> >>> Update: We are waiting for two more fixes.
> >>> GEODE-2386 Unable to launch dunit VMs in nightly builds
> >>> GEODE-2247 GFSH over HTTP succeeds without authentication
> >>> Thanks,Hitesh
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
Thanks Dan !!
From: Dan Smith
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release branch for 1.1.0
I checked in what I hope is a workaround for GEODE-2386. We'll see what
happens when the nightly build runs. It doesn'
ease+Notes
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Anthony
>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 31, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Hitesh Khamesra
>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Update: We are waiting for two more fixes.
>>>>&
elated
>>to the Jenkins environment. Thoughts?
+1
Thanks.Hitesh
From: Anthony Baker
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release branch for 1.1.0
Looks like the tests are failing even with your changes. They pass for
: Hitesh Khamesra
To: "dev@geode.apache.org"
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release branch for 1.1.0
We want to fix one more issue in this release
GEODE-2413 peer-to-peer authentication: Peer need to re-authenticate
coordinator while accepting vi
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 2:03 PM, Hitesh Khamesra
> wrote:
>
> GEODE-2413 : Implementing a peer-to-peer protocol for mutual auth require
> some more investigation. Apart from that, we need to support backward
> compatibility as well. Considering the complexity of the issue, would it
> make sen
+1 for pushing out GEODE-2413. I think what Anthony said makes sense.
-Dan
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Anthony Baker wrote:
>
> > On Feb 3, 2017, at 2:03 PM, Hitesh Khamesra
> wrote:
> >
> > GEODE-2413 : Implementing a peer-to-peer protocol for mutual auth
> require some more investigatio
Agree, no need to push changes in hurry...
-Anil.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> +1 for pushing out GEODE-2413. I think what Anthony said makes sense.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Anthony Baker wrote:
>
> >
> > > On Feb 3, 2017, at 2:03 PM, Hitesh Khamesra
Thanks, I have moved this out from 1.1.0.
-Hitesh
From: Anilkumar Gingade
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release branch for 1.1.0
Agree, no need to push changes in hurry...
-Anil.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Dan Smith
20 matches
Mail list logo
