Sorry for a long delay, just catching up on a ton of dev mail this morning.
FWIW, I agree that leaving feature/WIP branches in the main repository is bad
practice. The ease and flexibility of branching in Git leads to a strong
tendency towards proliferation of these things, and we really ought
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 8:41 PM, Owen Nichols wrote:
>
> -1 for “banning”
:facepalm: Sorry, poor choice of words. How about “strongly discouraged”
because of the harm enumerated perviously.
>
> The Geode community has strong precedent for protecting developers’ freedom
> to choose what work
, Jinmei Liao wrote:
+1 for ban the use of geode repo for feature branches. Less clutter is better.
From: Jacob Barrett
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 3:42 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches
I know
+1 for ban the use of geode repo for feature branches. Less clutter is better.
From: Jacob Barrett
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 3:42 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches
I know this has been
he open source Geode Community to
> > work on my personal fork
> >
> > Regards
> > Naba
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Hanson
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 4:35 PM
> > To: dev@geode.apache.org
&g
t;
> > Regards
> > Naba
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Hanson
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 4:35 PM
> > To: dev@geode.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for
&
ork on my personal fork
>
> Regards
> Naba
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Hanson
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 4:35 PM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for
> Feature/
y personal fork
Regards
Naba
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hanson
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 4:35 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP
Branches
While I am not 100% sure, I understand you
developers actually want to open a
> PR into the branch
>
> ____________
> From: Bruce Schuchardt
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 8:23 AM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for
or and then not cleaning up after the branch is
merged.
Regards
Naba
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Lindsey
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 8:50 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP
Branches
eode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP
Branches
Jake, you make some good points that I hadn't considered before.
On 6/2/20, 3:42 PM, "Jacob Barrett" wrote:
I know this has been brought up multiple times without resolution.
apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP
Branches
Jake, you make some good points that I hadn't considered before.
On 6/2/20, 3:42 PM, "Jacob Barrett" wrote:
I know this has been brought up multiple times without resolution. I want
us
Jake, you make some good points that I hadn't considered before.
On 6/2/20, 3:42 PM, "Jacob Barrett" wrote:
I know this has been brought up multiple times without resolution. I want
us resolve to ban the use of Geode repository for work in progress, feature
branches, or any other branches
rom: Ernie Burghardt
Sent: June 2, 2020 22:17
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP
Branches
I'm a fan of features on forks! It's fairly simple to make forks accessible to
other folks.
I know this isn't a vote, but
I'm a fan of features on forks! It's fairly simple to make forks accessible to
other folks.
I know this isn't a vote, but I'm a +1 for the concept...
EB
On 6/2/20, 3:42 PM, "Jacob Barrett" wrote:
I know this has been brought up multiple times without resolution. I want
us resolve to ban
> On Jun 2, 2020, at 4:50 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote:
>
> - Unified location, where anyone who wants to work on the feature can find
> the feature branch on the geode-repository
> - Visibility, the PRs to the geode repository can be viewed by everyone in
> the Geode community. Which will not hap
@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP
Branches
> On Jun 2, 2020, at 4:29 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote:
>
> - We are maintaining feature/GEODE-7665 which is the feature branch for PR
> clear work on which multiple developers are working on.
development happens in feature branches in Apache
projects Eg: Lucene and Kafka.
Regards
Naba
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Barrett
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 4:45 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP
Branches
> On
> On Jun 2, 2020, at 4:29 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote:
>
> - We are maintaining feature/GEODE-7665 which is the feature branch for PR
> clear work on which multiple developers are working on.
> - We are maintaining this in Geode repository.
> - All sub-tasks of GEODE-7665 are merged into this feat
> On Jun 2, 2020, at 4:40 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote:
>
> I don’t think it is right to make the open source Geode Community to work on
> my personal fork
Why not? I can fork your fork. I can PR to your fork. Its sort of what Git was
made for, no single source repository.
Can you elaborate on w
ob Barrett
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 3:43 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP
Branches
I know this has been brought up multiple times without resolution. I want
us resolve to ban the use of Geode repository f
ob Barrett
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 3:43 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP
Branches
I know this has been brought up multiple times without resolution. I want
us resolve to ban the use of Geode repository for work i
squash merged into develop and the feature branch will be deleted.
Regards
Naba
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Barrett
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 3:43 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches
I know this has been brought
+1 to avoiding clutter by not using feature branches on the Geode repo.
Sharing your own repo, as Kirk suggests, also works better when
collaborating with folks who aren't committers.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:16 PM Kirk Lund wrote:
> I prefer to share a fork among multiple developers instead of
I prefer to share a fork among multiple developers instead of using the
Apache Geode repository.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:42 PM Jacob Barrett wrote:
> I know this has been brought up multiple times without resolution. I want
> us resolve to ban the use of Geode repository for work in progress, f
I know this has been brought up multiple times without resolution. I want us
resolve to ban the use of Geode repository for work in progress, feature
branches, or any other branches that are not release or support branches. There
is no reason given the nature of GitHub why you can’t fork the rep
26 matches
Mail list logo
