Re: getSizeInBytes() return type

2017-07-10 Thread Michael Stolz
cov...@amdocs.com> wrote: > Raising this question again. > > Daniel > > From: Daniel Farcovich > Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:26 PM > To: 'dev@geode.apache.org' <dev@geode.apache.org> > Subject: getSizeInBytes() return type > > > Hi, > We implement getSiz

Re: getSizeInBytes() return type

2017-07-10 Thread Darrel Schneider
> > > > From: Daniel Farcovich > > Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:26 PM > > To: 'dev@geode.apache.org' <dev@geode.apache.org> > > Subject: getSizeInBytes() return type > > > > > > Hi, > > We implement getSizeInBytes() in from Sizeable i

Re: getSizeInBytes() return type

2017-07-10 Thread Jacob Barrett
< daniel.farcov...@amdocs.com> wrote: > Raising this question again. > > Daniel > > From: Daniel Farcovich > Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:26 PM > To: 'dev@geode.apache.org' <dev@geode.apache.org> > Subject: getSizeInBytes() return type > > > Hi, >

RE: getSizeInBytes() return type

2017-07-09 Thread Daniel Farcovich
Raising this question again. Daniel From: Daniel Farcovich Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:26 PM To: 'dev@geode.apache.org' <dev@geode.apache.org> Subject: getSizeInBytes() return type Hi, We implement getSizeInBytes() in from Sizeable interface. We have objects with size bigger than

getSizeInBytes() return type

2017-07-05 Thread Daniel Farcovich
Hi, We implement getSizeInBytes() in from Sizeable interface. We have objects with size bigger than MAXINT, bigger than 2GB. What is the impact of refactoring the code to return long instead of int? I mean except the technical aspect of changing the return types of the calling functions etc.