Re: geode contribution process proposal

2015-06-17 Thread Rahul Diyewar
Other approach is to create dependency tree for tests (what tests depends on which code) and CI to run only the impacted tests for the corresponding code change (refer http://google-engtools.blogspot.in/2011/06/testing-at-speed-and-scale-of-google.html). I am not sure how dependency tree will be ma

Re: LogMarker guidelines

2015-06-17 Thread Kirk Lund
Hi Ashvin, The way we're using log markers is to provide an alternative way for enabling verbose logging beyond just specifying log levels per class or per package. Some of our concepts (LRU, TOMBSTONE, DISTRIBUTION, etc) span code that doesn't follow the same boundaries as classes or packages. I

LogMarker guidelines

2015-06-17 Thread Ashvin A
Hi, I can use log4j configuration to change log levels by specific packages and classes. I noticed sizable usable of LogMarkers in the code for additional filtering. I guess markers are used for cases beyond trace level logging and across package boundaries. I was wondering if their are any guidel

Re: geode contribution process proposal

2015-06-17 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:13 PM, jun aoki wrote: > Anthony, thank you for providing the info. It is straightforward while > developing. > > Some of us think we should run all tests (several hours according to Dan) > and there are good reasons to do so. > Roman, if you know the answer, please let u