[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #83 was SUCCESSFUL (with 1140 tests)

2015-10-01 Thread Spring CI
--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #83 was successful. --- Scheduled 1144 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-83/ -- This me

Re: Propose changing check to only depend on UnitTest

2015-10-01 Thread Nitin Lamba
+1 . Initial dev experience needs to be frictionless... :) From: Bruce Schuchardt Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 4:56 PM To: dev@geode.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Propose changing check to only depend on UnitTest +1 Le 10/1/2015 2:21 PM, Darrel S

Re: Propose changing check to only depend on UnitTest

2015-10-01 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
+1 Le 10/1/2015 2:21 PM, Darrel Schneider a écrit : +1 How about "precheckin" for the target that runs IntegrationTest and DistributionTest? Perhaps this target should start with a line informing the runner that it will take hours. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: Proposal

Re: Review Request 36993: GEODE-146: Queries are not thread safe due to scopeId variable

2015-10-01 Thread anilkumar gingade
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36993/#review101291 --- Ship it! Ship It! - anilkumar gingade On July 31, 2015, 5:14 p.

Re: Review Request 37404: GEODE-157: Check for colocation not failing if non colocated comparison is first comparison made

2015-10-01 Thread anilkumar gingade
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37404/#review101289 --- Ship it! Ship It! - anilkumar gingade On Aug. 12, 2015, 5:59 p.

Re: Review Request 37904: GEODE-280: GroupByPartitionedQueryDUnitTest.testCompactRangeIndex fails intermittently

2015-10-01 Thread anilkumar gingade
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37904/#review101288 --- Ship it! Ship It! - anilkumar gingade On Oct. 1, 2015, 10:08 p.

Re: Review Request 38939: GEODE-379: fix spelling of entry-time-to-live-expiration-action option

2015-10-01 Thread Kirk Lund
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38939/#review101287 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kirk Lund On Oct. 1, 2015, 9:43 p.m., Darre

Re: Propose changing check to only depend on UnitTest

2015-10-01 Thread Swapnil Bawaskar
For Geode in "5 minutes" do we even want to leave the unit tests in? building geode and running unit tests on my laptop took north of 4:30 minutes, just a clean build took 1 minute. If we removed the unit tests, then we could still have a target "test" for Unit, Integration and DistributionTest.

Re: Review Request 37904: GEODE-280: GroupByPartitionedQueryDUnitTest.testCompactRangeIndex fails intermittently

2015-10-01 Thread Jason Huynh
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37904/ --- (Updated Oct. 1, 2015, 10:08 p.m.) Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade,

Review Request 38939: GEODE-379: fix spelling of entry-time-to-live-expiration-action option

2015-10-01 Thread Darrel Schneider
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38939/ --- Review request for geode and Kirk Lund. Bugs: GEODE-379 https://issues.apac

Re: Geode Creation Region entry-time-to-live-expiration-action

2015-10-01 Thread Darrel Schneider
Looks like this is caused by a typo in the source code. I found this line in CliStrings.java: public static final String CREATE_REGION__ENTRYEXPIRATIONTTLACTION = "entry-time-to-live-expiriation-action"; So try using the typo in gfsh (i.e. "expiriation" instead of "expiration"). I'll file a jira t

Re: Propose changing check to only depend on UnitTest

2015-10-01 Thread Darrel Schneider
+1 How about "precheckin" for the target that runs IntegrationTest and DistributionTest? Perhaps this target should start with a line informing the runner that it will take hours. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > Proposal: > > 1) Remove IntegrationTest and DistributionTest f

Re: Geode Creation Region entry-time-to-live-expiration-action

2015-10-01 Thread Gregory Chase
FWD to user as this is a user question. Perfectly valid question. Just want it to be searchable by the right audience. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Real Wes Williams wrote: > The GemFire User’s Guide > http://gemfire.docs.pivotal.io/pdf/pivotal-gemfire-ug.pdf < > http://gemfire.docs.pivota

Geode Creation Region entry-time-to-live-expiration-action

2015-10-01 Thread Real Wes Williams
The GemFire User’s Guide http://gemfire.docs.pivotal.io/pdf/pivotal-gemfire-ug.pdf reports on page 740 that --entry-time-to-live-expiration-action is a valid option for create region. geode> create region —name=account --entry-time-to

Set maximum connections per client on the geode server side

2015-10-01 Thread Vinay Upadhya
Hello, We have the max-connections property on the cache-server tag on a geode server which limits the incoming connections to that number. Is there a way however to assign a certain number of maximum connections per client connecting to a node? Vinay Upadhya | Sr. Field Engineer 917-514-1842 |

Propose changing check to only depend on UnitTest

2015-10-01 Thread Kirk Lund
Proposal: 1) Remove IntegrationTest and DistributionTest from "check" target 2) Add a new target (name TBD) that executes IntegrationTest and DistributionTest Reasons: 1) new people who clone and then build wait forever and complain that build hung resulting in bad first impression by users 2)

Re: Review Request 38935: GEODE-378: removed SynchronousQueueNoSpin

2015-10-01 Thread Dan Smith
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38935/#review101273 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Dan Smith On Oct. 1, 2015, 6:47 p.m., Darre

Review Request 38935: GEODE-378: removed SynchronousQueueNoSpin

2015-10-01 Thread Darrel Schneider
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38935/ --- Review request for geode and Dan Smith. Bugs: GEODE-378 https://issues.apac

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Oct 2015 ([ppmc])

2015-10-01 Thread Anthony Baker
Any volunteers for the report this month? Or are we one the quarter schedule now? Anthony Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 30, 2015, at 3:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 02:15:05PM +, Marvin wrote: >> >> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 14 October 2015, 10:

Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-nightly #232

2015-10-01 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See Changes: [dschneider] GEODE-324: defer deserialization of old value in PR put -- [...truncated 2611 lines...] Download https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/json4s/json4s-ast_2.10/3.2.4/json4s-ast