Re: Review of 1.0.0-alpha1 issues

> On Nov 30, 2015, at 11:23 AM, Nitin Lamba wrote: > > +1 > > I do have a fundamental question about versioning (rather what versions can > be taken for voting/ approvals): > > Can an 'alpha' which has known issues (like GEODE-27 or GEODE-386 for apache > namespace, etc) be

Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-nightly #296

See -- [...truncated 273 lines...] :gemfire-assembly:distZip :gemfire-assembly:jar SKIPPED :gemfire-assembly:assemble

[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #143 was SUCCESSFUL (with 1214 tests). Change made by Jens Deppe.

--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #143 was successful. --- This was manually triggered by Jens Deppe. 1218 tests in total.

Re: Final updates to Geode Website - Ready ?

Thanks William. Can we postpone moving the docs hosting site until after the website refresh? Seems like there is some good work here that would be nice to see published ASAP. Anthony > On Nov 30, 2015, at 10:27 AM, William Markito wrote: > > Thank you very much for

Re: Review of 1.0.0-alpha1 issues

Huge +1 for GEODE-27 before release. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:13 AM, John Blum wrote: > Looking ahead, 1 issue, among others, that should warrant careful attention > before the 1.0.0 RC, is GEODE-27 > [0]. Getting the POM >

Re: Final updates to Geode Website - Ready ?

Thank you very much for the awesome feedback Niall! Will try to get an updated version up again soon. The only issue of the list that I can't really fix myself but that we should discuss is around moving the docs from http://geode.docs.pivotal.io On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Niall Pemberton

Geode 1.0.0 (alpha1): Open questions

Wanted to start a thread capturing all the open (mostly process) questions for the first alpha1 release: - Does ASF have Pivotal's (or EMC's, VMware's, Gemstone's) CCLA on file? Who can confirm? This is a legal requirement - Is the alternate (podling) release

Re: Review of 1.0.0-alpha1 issues

+1 I do have a fundamental question about versioning (rather what versions can be taken for voting/ approvals): Can an 'alpha' which has known issues (like GEODE-27 or GEODE-386 for apache namespace, etc) be taken all the way through the PMC process for approvals? Such a release will have to

Re: Review of 1.0.0-alpha1 issues

Here is more detail on versioning http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-naming (under versioning section) Can we set a release task list... E.g.: What tasks/items are expected to complete to do an alpha, beta and final 1.0 release... -Anil. On

Re: Topic for Dec 17 Geode Clubhouse - what's coming in Apache Geode 1.0 Alpha?

+ William, We want to get the topic for the next Geode Clubhouse user education locked down for the 12/17 9AM Pacific time. We had discussed an overview of what's coming in Apache Geode 1.0 Alpha. There was also off channel talk about maybe doing a deep dive on the off heap storage feature. Do

Re: Geode 1.0.0 (alpha1): Open questions

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Nitin Lamba wrote: > Wanted to start a thread capturing all the open (mostly process) questions > for the first alpha1 release: > > > - Does ASF have Pivotal's (or EMC's, VMware's, Gemstone's) CCLA on file? > Who can confirm? This is a legal

Can we close done Reviews on ReviewBoard ?

That would be really nice so we can have a better picture/metric about what's pending review vs what's still really open there. I'm going to start that by closing the ones that are older than 1 month (with no updates) Please let me know if you think otherwise. -- William Markito Oliveira --

Re: Review of 1.0.0-alpha1 issues

Thanks Anil, >From the best practices section: "TODO: (move to a note) Notes on 0.x releases verses alpha and betas. It is better to use 0.x releases than to create numerous alphas and betas for 1.0. Conventionally, 0.x releases are aimed at early adopters only without a strong promise of

Re: Review of 1.0.0-alpha1 issues

I would like to see one alpha. I don't think we're sure how solid some of this stuff is. "Testing cannot prove the absence of bugs...only the presence." -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Nov 30, 2015 4:28 PM, "Nitin Lamba" wrote:

[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #144 was SUCCESSFUL (with 1214 tests)

--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #144 was successful. --- Scheduled 1218 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-144/ -- This

FOSDEM 2016 - take action by 4th of December 2015

As most of you probably know FOSDEM 2016 (the biggest, 100% free open source developer conference) is right around the corner: https://fosdem.org/2016/ We hope to have an ASF booth and we would love to see as many ASF projects as possible present at various tracks (AKA Developer rooms):