---
Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #180 failed.
---
Scheduled
No failed tests found, a possible compilation error.
https://build.spring.io/browse/SG
That looks fine to me.
-Dan
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Kirk Lund wrote:
> *I pushed three commits that are now causing problems with the
> distributedTest task. I want to revert these so I have more time to figure
> out what's wrong. (They were originally part of feature/GEODE-217 and I've
*I pushed three commits that are now causing problems with the
distributedTest task. I want to revert these so I have more time to figure
out what's wrong. (They were originally part of feature/GEODE-217 and I've
been trying to commit the changes from that branch to develop in much
smaller pieces).
You're right Anthony - my bad.
I did download the archive but accidentally opened the older tar.gz from April,
2015:
geode-1.0.0.0-SNAPSHOT.src.tar.gz
(the original source contributed to Apache).
All's good now. Yes, did notice few extra folders but fixing that may be low
priority.
- Nitin
_
I wonder if we’re looking at different things??
When I download the night-build tarball at [1], I only found one Pivotal
copyright:
Anthony-Baker-MacBook-Pro:tmp abaker$ tar xf
~/Downloads/apache-geode-src-1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.tar && grep -r Pivotal
apache-geode-src-1.0.0-incubating-SNAPS
The gemfire-jgroups project has been deleted on the develop branch. That
happened when feature/GEODE-77 was merged to develop. If it's still
sitting around in a checkout it should be deleted.
Le 1/4/2016 1:00 PM, Nitin Lamba a écrit :
I didn't build locally but picked the artifacts that are g
I didn't build locally but picked the artifacts that are getting posted from CI:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Geode-nightly/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/gemfire-assembly/build/distributions/apache-geode-src-1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
All the java files I checked still had Pivotal copyright
Hmmm, that sounds odd. The srcDistTar task uses the current working copy. You
might try a `git clean -fd` to remove all non-version controlled artifacts (be
careful!).
Which copyrights are missing? Here’s what I see in the src distribution:
Anthony-Baker-MacBook-Pro:distributions abaker$ hea
Thanks Anthony!! This is great progress as the community marches towards the
first GEODE release!
Besides the missing LICENSE and NOTICE files (you have a separate thread on
GEODE-610), I noticed a few things in the src artifact:
- The copyright updates are missing
- It still has jgroups/ LGPL f
Oops! Thanks for catching the typo.
Anthony
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:43 AM, Nitin Lamba wrote:
>
> I think Anthony meant 'feature/GEODE-610' branch:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/tree/feature/GEODE-610
>
> - Nitin
>
>
> From: Michael Sto
I think Anthony meant 'feature/GEODE-610' branch:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/tree/feature/GEODE-610
- Nitin
From: Michael Stolz
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2016 9:55 AM
To: dev@geode.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: LICENSE and NOTICE
I don'
I don't see a GEODE-210 branch. Am I missing something?
--
Mike Stolz
Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
Mobile: 631-835-4771
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Anthony Baker wrote:
> Look on the feature/GEODE-210 branch.
>
> The source distribution versions are in the root directory.
>
+1
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Mark Bretl wrote:
> +1
>
> --Mark
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Anthony Baker wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > > On Dec 30, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 7:23 PM, William Markito
> > wrote:
> > >> +1
> > >
>
I forgot to checkout develop and pull it before using the feature finish
cmd.
It's merged in now!
Thanks,
Kirk
On Monday, January 4, 2016, Jens Deppe wrote:
> Kirk,
>
> Did your 'origin' remote change at all? Does 'git branch -v -v' tell you
> anything interesting?
>
> --Jens
>
> On Mon, Jan 4
Kirk,
Did your 'origin' remote change at all? Does 'git branch -v -v' tell you
anything interesting?
--Jens
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Kirk Lund wrote:
> Right now I'm stuck as git won't let me merge the changes to develop. I'm
> not sure what to do next and I'm not going to experiment as
+1
--Mark
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Anthony Baker wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Dec 30, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 7:23 PM, William Markito
> wrote:
> >> +1
> >
> > So... shall I commit? ;-)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
>
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41803/#review112598
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jinmei Liao
On Dec. 30, 2015, 6:57 p.m., Je
Right now I'm stuck as git won't let me merge the changes to develop. I'm
not sure what to do next and I'm not going to experiment as that usually
breaks things worse. I may have to recreate the branch and do this work
over.
/c/dev/gemfire_CLEAN/open [540]$ git flow feature finish
-r GEODE-714
Bra
Look on the feature/GEODE-210 branch.
The source distribution versions are in the root directory.
The binary distribution versions are in gemfire-assembly/src/main/dist/
Each distribution has different requirements since different external
components are bundled.
Anthony
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 8
Where can I find these files?
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Anthony Baker wrote:
> I’ve made a start on our LICENSE and NOTICE files (for both source and
> binary distributions) on the feature/GEODE-610 branch. Thanks to Niall for
> the excellent analysis to get this started. If you’d like t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41803/#review112592
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jacob Barrett
On Dec. 30, 2015, 10:57 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41803/#review112591
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kirk Lund
On Dec. 30, 2015, 6:57 p.m., Jens
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41803/#review112581
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Anthony Baker
On Dec. 30, 2015, 6:57 p.m.,
I’ve made a start on our LICENSE and NOTICE files (for both source and binary
distributions) on the feature/GEODE-610 branch. Thanks to Niall for the
excellent analysis to get this started. If you’d like to contribute to this
you can:
1) Review the contents of the LICENSE files and see if the
24 matches
Mail list logo
