[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #217 was SUCCESSFUL (with 1244 tests). Change made by John Blum .

--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #217 was successful. --- Scheduled with changes by John Blum . 1248 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/brows

Re: Apache compatibility with Eclipse license

I filed a bug to change the gemfire-junit code to only extend JUnit classes (instead of borrowing/altering code). https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-953 Completing this ticket should resolve the issue. -Kirk On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > Also just to be very cl

Re: Apache compatibility with Eclipse license

Also just to be very clear even though it probably doesn't matter: DUnit and the classes under gemfire-junit are only used by our tests. The product obviously does not use any of this code. -Kirk On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > SerializableExternalResource in Apache Geode b

Re: Apache compatibility with Eclipse license

SerializableExternalResource in Apache Geode borrows some code because you can't override ExternalResource to add a throws-clause to the method protected void after() https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/blob/develop/gemfire-junit/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/test/junit/rules/Serializab

Re: Apache compatibility with Eclipse license

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > Be clear about which license your talking about - there is both an Eclipse > Public License and Eclipse Distribution License. Junit is licensed under > the Eclipse Public License. > > This page lists the EPL under WEAK COPYLEFT: > > http://www.ap

Re: Review Request 43449: GEODE-890: CompiledLike member variables are not thread safe

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43449/ --- (Updated Feb. 10, 2016, 11:28 p.m.) Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade

Re: Apache compatibility with Eclipse license

Be clear about which license your talking about - there is both an Eclipse Public License and Eclipse Distribution License. Junit is licensed under the Eclipse Public License. This page lists the EPL under WEAK COPYLEFT: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html -Dan On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:1

Apache compatibility with Eclipse license

Is the Eclipse license not compatible with Apache license? What I mean is: does Apache allow derivative works of open source code that uses Eclipse license? For example, can someone write classes in an Apache project that extend, use and derive or borrow code from JUnit (junit.org) classes? Thank

[GitHub] incubator-geode pull request: GEODE-887: correct paths in README.m...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/86 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

Re: Review Request 43346: GEODE-657: Add an abort flag to the FinishBackupMessage

> On Feb. 9, 2016, 1:13 a.m., Anthony Baker wrote: > > gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/admin/internal/FinishBackupRequest.java, > > line 122 > > > > > > Do we need to use the versioned form of from/t

Re: Review Request 43346: GEODE-657: Add an abort flag to the FinishBackupMessage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43346/ --- (Updated Feb. 10, 2016, 11:03 p.m.) Review request for geode and Barry Oglesby.

Review Request 43449: GEDOE-890: CompiledLike member variables are not thread safe

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43449/ --- Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, and Dan Smith. Repo

Re: Three redundancy zones

Dan, That's exactly what I'm thinking. 3 copies of data across 3 racks, largely eliminating the likelihood that one rack failing can cause the other to shoot himself in the head. -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Feb 10, 2016 12:15 PM, "Dan Smith"

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release Scope - version 1.0.0-incubating.M2

Here is an example of a (possible) *dependency conflict* caused by *Apache Geode* requiring a different version of Jackson than is pulled in by HBase, which also has a dependency on Jackson, where HBase is a also dependency of *Apache Geode*. This dependency graph comes from *Spring Data GemFire*

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release Scope - version 1.0.0-incubating.M2

My only concern with slotting GEODE-37 into M2 is that we’ve already added some significant new features to the code base (Pulse, WAN, CQ, Modules). It would be nice to stabilize those and get them into our user’s hands before tackling another potentially destabilizing set of changes that could

Re: Three redundancy zones

Sure, you can have as many redundancy zones as you want. I'm don't think the redundancy zone setting affects quorum calculations. But if you can do something with the physical topology (3 different racks?) that makes it less likely to lose half of the members at once that might help. -Dan On We

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release Scope - version 1.0.0-incubating.M2

Cool. I wouldn’t expect much improvement but your observations will be really helpful when we tackle GEODE-27 in earnest. Anthony > On Feb 10, 2016, at 10:05 AM, John Blum wrote: > > No problem, :-). As an FYI... I am retesting Spring Session with Apache > Geode M1 release to see if the rel

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release Scope - version 1.0.0-incubating.M2

No problem, :-). As an FYI... I am retesting Spring Session with Apache Geode M1 release to see if the release POM helps resolve the dependency issues I had. Will report back my findings. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > John, thanks for working through this. Great sugg

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release Scope - version 1.0.0-incubating.M2

John, thanks for working through this. Great suggestions! Anthony > On Feb 10, 2016, at 8:21 AM, John Blum wrote: > > Following up... > > I spent a few extra cycles researching the *Apache Geode* dependencies > further. > > Looking at the POM file >

Three redundancy zones

Is it possible to set up 3 separate redundancy zones so that a network segmentation would have less chance of making the wrong decision about quorum? -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771

[GitHub] incubator-geode pull request: Build PR 88: Update committers' list

Github user davebarnes97 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/90 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the f

[GitHub] incubator-geode pull request: Build PR 88: Update committers' list

Github user davebarnes97 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/90#issuecomment-182494611 Rendered obsolete by site rebuild for commit 0daf181 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release Scope - version 1.0.0-incubating.M2

Following up... I spent a few extra cycles researching the *Apache Geode* dependencies further. Looking at the POM file [0] (for gemfire-core) for the M1 release of *Apache Geod

Jenkins build is back to normal : Geode-nightly #374

See