Jenkins build is back to normal : Geode-release #30

2016-10-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See

Re: backward compatibility testing against GemFire 8.x WAN/clients

2016-10-06 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
Thanks Anthony. I thought there was some interest in supporting old GemFire clients and WAN. Is there no way to download it without a login/EULA? I'm currently using a different repo but maybe that's only available in Pivotal's network. As far as M3 goes, do you think there would be any va

Jenkins build is back to normal : Geode-nightly #614

2016-10-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See

Re: backward compatibility testing against GemFire 8.x WAN/clients

2016-10-06 Thread Dick Cavender
Only on initial setup/access to repo.pivotal.io is the EULA acceptance required. After that you should be able to pull from any repo there without interaction but you will need to provide the creds as part of the pull. Are you instead using dist.gemstone.com for the older jars which is the or

Re: backward compatibility testing against GemFire 8.x WAN/clients

2016-10-06 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
Yes, dist.gemstone.com. Le 10/6/2016 à 9:08 AM, Dick Cavender a écrit : Only on initial setup/access to repo.pivotal.io is the EULA acceptance required. After that you should be able to pull from any repo there without interaction but you will need to provide the creds as part of the pull. A

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-10-06 Thread Dan Smith
+1 for moving it to a feature branch. -Dan On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jason Huynh wrote: > Bumping to see if we have come to a decision on whether we want to move > this to a feature branch and get rid of it for 1.0 or post 1.0, especially > now that the 1.0 release branch has been cut > >

Re: backward compatibility testing against GemFire 8.x WAN/clients

2016-10-06 Thread Mark Bretl
-1 for this I do understand the intent and reason behind this, however, in addition to the reasons Anthony provided, I do not believe this community should carry the burden of testing compatibility with proprietary/commercial software. Even though Geode has its history in GemFire, I can only see t

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-10-06 Thread Mark Bretl
+1 for feature branch as well. --Mark On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > +1 for moving it to a feature branch. > > -Dan > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jason Huynh wrote: > > Bumping to see if we have come to a decision on whether we want to move > > this to a feature branc

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-10-06 Thread Joey McAllister
+1 for moving to a feature branch. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:32 AM Mark Bretl wrote: > +1 for feature branch as well. > > --Mark > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > > +1 for moving it to a feature branch. > > > > -Dan > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jason Huynh wrot

Re: Review Request 52571: GEODE-1570: upgrade spring libraries

2016-10-06 Thread Jared Stewart
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52571/#review151676 --- My previous issues were due to applying this patch to DEVELOP rath

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-10-06 Thread Dave Barnes
So, what form should the JIRA ticket assume? (a) Move HIbernate from develop to a feature branch, or (b) Merge Hibernate code to develop (as a future task, cf GEODE-1416 for how the NC was handled) After somebody (which I can do, if you like) creates a ticket for the code, I'll create a subtask fo

Re: Review Request 52571: GEODE-1570: upgrade spring libraries

2016-10-06 Thread Jinmei Liao
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52571/ --- (Updated Oct. 6, 2016, 6:31 p.m.) Review request for geode, Anthony Baker, Jare

Re: Review Request 52571: GEODE-1570: upgrade spring libraries

2016-10-06 Thread Jinmei Liao
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52571/ --- (Updated Oct. 6, 2016, 6:34 p.m.) Review request for geode, Anthony Baker, Jare

Re: Review Request 52571: GEODE-1570: upgrade spring libraries

2016-10-06 Thread Anthony Baker
> On Oct. 5, 2016, 9:24 p.m., Anthony Baker wrote: > > geode-core/build.gradle, line 90 > > > > > > We just eliminated spring-core from the classpath of geode-core...what > > code needs this jar? > > Jinmei Liao wro

Re: Review Request 52571: GEODE-1570: upgrade spring libraries

2016-10-06 Thread Anthony Baker
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52571/#review151712 --- NOTICE changes look good! - Anthony Baker On Oct. 6, 2016, 6:34

Re: backward compatibility testing against GemFire 8.x WAN/clients

2016-10-06 Thread Jacob Barrett
-1 Completely agree with Mark on this. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:31 AM Mark Bretl wrote: > -1 for this > > I do understand the intent and reason behind this, however, in addition to > the reasons Anthony provided, I do not believe this community should carry > the burden of testing compatibility

Re: backward compatibility testing against GemFire 8.x WAN/clients

2016-10-06 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
I believe that a backwards compatibility framework is required. Even if just to confirm the compatibility between supported Geode versions. If this framework were to be used/extended by any user of the Geode ecosystem, then it becomes their responsibility to maintain that extension. --Udo O

Re: backward compatibility testing against GemFire 8.x WAN/clients

2016-10-06 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
Thanks everyone. I'm going to keep the framework out of Geode, at least for now. We can pick up the discussion again when we have a 1.0.0 Geode release to test against. Le 10/6/2016 à 1:38 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer a écrit : I believe that a backwards compatibility framework is required. Even if ju

Re: Review Request 52571: GEODE-1570: upgrade spring libraries

2016-10-06 Thread Jared Stewart
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52571/#review151724 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jared Stewart On Oct. 6, 2016, 6:34 p.m.

Review Request 52621: GEM-1032: GMSAuthenticator needs to get security properties from system properties

2016-10-06 Thread Jinmei Liao
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52621/ --- Review request for geode, Jared Stewart, Kevin Duling, and Kirk Lund. Repositor

Re: Review Request 52621: GEM-1032: GMSAuthenticator needs to get security properties from system properties

2016-10-06 Thread Jinmei Liao
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52621/ --- (Updated Oct. 6, 2016, 11:03 p.m.) Review request for geode, Jared Stewart, Kev

Re: Review Request 52621: GEM-1032: GMSAuthenticator needs to get security properties from system properties

2016-10-06 Thread Kirk Lund
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52621/#review151737 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kirk Lund On Oct. 6, 2016, 11:03 p.m., J

Re: Review Request 52621: GEM-1032: GMSAuthenticator needs to get security properties from system properties

2016-10-06 Thread Jared Stewart
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52621/#review151742 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jared Stewart On Oct. 6, 2016, 11:03 p.m

Podling Report Reminder - October 2016

2016-10-06 Thread johndament
Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 October 2016, 10:30 am PDT. The report for your podling will form