+1 to merge
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
> +1 to merge.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Jianxia Chen wrote:
>
> > +1 for merge
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Anilkumar Gingade
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for merge.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1
forgot to ask, do we need .gitignore file? there's only one line of "/bin/"
in it.
Thanks!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36731/#review92775
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Qihong Chen
On July 23, 2015, 4:29 p.m
I'm not talking about changes to GEODE-9 feature branch. Just want to know
if this merge is just "copy-ing" all files from GEODE-9 feature branch to
develop branch?
Thanks!
Hi Jason,
Is there any "real" changes from GEODE-9 feature branch except adding all
files to develop branch?
Thanks,
Qihong
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36408/#review91625
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Qihong Chen
On July 10, 2015, 11:32 p.m
The problem is caused by multiple major dependencies and different release
cycles. Spark Geode Connector depends on two products: Spark and Geode (not
counting other dependencies), and Spark moves much faster than Geode, and
some features/code are not backward compatible.
Our initial connector imp