+1
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Kenneth Howe wrote:
> +1
>
> Sounds like a good idea, at least for DUnits and integration tests.
>
> Ken
>
> > On Mar 28, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > If we suspect GC to be playing a role here, then I think we should.
> >
> >
+1
Sounds like a good idea, at least for DUnits and integration tests.
Ken
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote:
>
> +1
>
> If we suspect GC to be playing a role here, then I think we should.
>
> --Udo
>
> On 29/03/2016 8:52 am, Kirk Lund wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Should we also en
+1
If we suspect GC to be playing a role here, then I think we should.
--Udo
On 29/03/2016 8:52 am, Kirk Lund wrote:
+1
Should we also enable it for test and integrationTest? I've seen some weird
failures there that I would think might have been caused by a
stop-the-world GC pause.
On Mon,
+1
Le 3/28/2016 2:02 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer a écrit :
Hi there guys,
Would there be any objections to add the GC logging settings to the
DUnit tests?
This might help with the debugging of DUnit tests, as we cannot be
100% sure that GC is not a factor here.
--Udo
+1
Should we also enable it for test and integrationTest? I've seen some weird
failures there that I would think might have been caused by a
stop-the-world GC pause.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> +1
>
> No objections here.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Udo
+1
No objections here.
-Dan
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer
wrote:
> Hi there guys,
>
> Would there be any objections to add the GC logging settings to the DUnit
> tests?
> This might help with the debugging of DUnit tests, as we cannot be 100%
> sure that GC is not a factor her
Hi there guys,
Would there be any objections to add the GC logging settings to the
DUnit tests?
This might help with the debugging of DUnit tests, as we cannot be 100%
sure that GC is not a factor here.
--Udo
