Re: Geode-nightly still has gemfire-pulse step

Oops: I believe you're correct -- there is no "gemfire-pulse" so that job should *not* be referring to it. On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > I believe you're correct -- there is no "gemfire-pulse" so that job should > be referring to it. > > -Kirk > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016

Re: Geode-nightly still has gemfire-pulse step

I thought the git clean 'gemfire-pulse' was there to catch issues when it was renamed to 'geode-pulse', do we still need it anymore? I think it can be removed. --Mark On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > I believe you're correct -- there is no "gemfire-pulse" so that job should

Re: Geode-nightly still has gemfire-pulse step

I believe you're correct -- there is no "gemfire-pulse" so that job should be referring to it. -Kirk On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:34 AM, William Markito wrote: > Here is the current configuration on geode-nightly: > > git clean -d -f gemfire-pulse/src/main/resources/ > > Shouldn't this be : > >

Geode-nightly still has gemfire-pulse step

Here is the current configuration on geode-nightly: git clean -d -f gemfire-pulse/src/main/resources/ Shouldn't this be : git clean -d -f geode-pulse/src/main/resources/ Thanks -- ~/William