Re: Review Request 48658: Change from MultiFieldQueryParser to StandardQueryParser

2016-06-13 Thread Jason Huynh
> On June 13, 2016, 6:08 p.m., Dan Smith wrote: > > I don't think we want to use the first field as the default field long > > term. That's behavior that might be confusing to users, especially since > > the order of the fields is not really defined if you pass in a map of > >

Re: Review Request 48658: Change from MultiFieldQueryParser to StandardQueryParser

2016-06-13 Thread Dan Smith
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/48658/#review137345 --- Ship it! I don't think we want to use the first field as the

Review Request 48658: Change from MultiFieldQueryParser to StandardQueryParser

2016-06-13 Thread Jason Huynh
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/48658/ --- Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, nabarun nag, Dan Smith, and