ar and intuitive.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Ford [mailto:vf...@pivotal.io]
> Sent: 21 May 2015 18:57
> To: dev@geode.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [rtds-dev] What to call Apache Geode's command-line shell tool...
>
> +1 to calling the intera
+1
geode is very clear and intuitive.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Ford [mailto:vf...@pivotal.io]
Sent: 21 May 2015 18:57
To: dev@geode.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [rtds-dev] What to call Apache Geode's command-line shell tool...
+1 to calling the interactive shell &
How about providing a symlink such that we essentially provide paths for
both 'gfsh' and 'geode' to make script transition easier.
I'd agree with Edin on his point #2. I don't think a banner of:
_ ____
/\ \ /\ \ /
Well, concerning #4, there will be differences in the command-line
interface (as perceived by users), particularly for the Gateway/WAN
(command) support.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Edin Zulich wrote:
>
> +1 keep gfsh for both.
>
>
> My reasons:
>
> 1. There is no legal requirement (or any
+1 keep gfsh for both.
My reasons:
1. There is no legal requirement (or any other for that matter) to change the
name
2. The argument for distinguishing between a geode and gemfire installation is
weak. Some of us have and switch between multiple installations of GemFire all
the time. There
+1 to calling the interactive shell "geode"
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Vincent Ford wrote:
> +1 to calling the interactive shell "geode"
>
> *Vince Ford*
> GemFire Sustenance Engineering
> Beaverton, OR USA
> 503-533-3726 (office)
> http://www.pivotal.io
> Open Source Project Geode
> http
+1 to calling the interactive shell "geode"
*Vince Ford*
GemFire Sustenance Engineering
Beaverton, OR USA
503-533-3726 (office)
http://www.pivotal.io
Open Source Project Geode https://network.pivotal.io/products/project-geode
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Rajesh Kumar wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu
+1
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Bruce Schuchardt
wrote:
> +1
>
> Le 5/21/2015 10:05 AM, Brian Dunlap a écrit :
>
>> Here's my $0.02:
>>
>> I like geode for geode and gfsh for Gemfire.
>>
>>
>> - At Southwest Airlines, we have a ton of existing environment
>> management scripts
>>
+1
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Bruce Schuchardt
wrote:
> +1
>
> Le 5/21/2015 10:05 AM, Brian Dunlap a écrit :
>>
>> Here's my $0.02:
>>
>> I like geode for geode and gfsh for Gemfire.
>>
>>
>> - At Southwest Airlines, we have a ton of existing environment
>> management scripts
>>
-1 no thanks.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> How about GEodeInteractiveSHell or geisha ? ;)
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:33AM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Le 5/21/2015 10:05 AM, Brian Dunlap a écrit :
>> >Here's my $0.02:
>> >
>> >I like geode for geode an
How about GEodeInteractiveSHell or geisha ? ;)
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:33AM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
> +1
>
> Le 5/21/2015 10:05 AM, Brian Dunlap a écrit :
> >Here's my $0.02:
> >
> >I like geode for geode and gfsh for Gemfire.
> >
> >
> >- At Southwest Airlines, we have a ton of existing
+1
Le 5/21/2015 10:05 AM, Brian Dunlap a écrit :
Here's my $0.02:
I like geode for geode and gfsh for Gemfire.
- At Southwest Airlines, we have a ton of existing environment
management scripts
- It's important for users to not cross the streams - - > explicit =
good
- Mana
Here's my $0.02:
I like geode for geode and gfsh for Gemfire.
- At Southwest Airlines, we have a ton of existing environment
management scripts
- It's important for users to not cross the streams - - > explicit =
good
- Managing gfsh vs. gsh in existing scripts is error prone. (t
Question: what about just geode? There is precedent in SpringXD. Their shell
is spring-xd>
> On May 21, 2015, at 12:53 PM, pulkit chandra wrote:
>
> +1 Gsh.
>
> If called GoSH I won't mind that either :) .
>
> Best Regards,
> *Pulkit Chandra*
>
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Namrata
+1 Gsh.
If called GoSH I won't mind that either :) .
Best Regards,
*Pulkit Chandra*
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Namrata Thanvi wrote:
> +1 for gsh
>
>
> Regards,
> Namrata
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Tushar Khair
+1 for gsh
Regards,
Namrata
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Tushar Khairnar
> wrote:
> > +1 for gsh
>
> +1 to gsh (although I do reserve the right to pronounce it as GoSH ;-))
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Tushar Khairnar
wrote:
> +1 for gsh
+1 to gsh (although I do reserve the right to pronounce it as GoSH ;-))
Thanks,
Roman.
+1 for gsh
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Pid wrote:
> On 21/05/2015 01:24, Jacob Barrett wrote:
> > gsh - G SHell - Geode SHell (my vote)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > gash - Geode Again SHell (nod to bash)
>
> Definitely not that.
>
>
> > gctl - Geode ConTroL
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > —
On 21/05/2015 01:24, Jacob Barrett wrote:
> gsh - G SHell - Geode SHell (my vote)
>
>
>
>
> gash - Geode Again SHell (nod to bash)
Definitely not that.
> gctl - Geode ConTroL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> —
>
> Jacob Barrett
>
> Enterprise Architect
>
> Pivotal
>
>
>
>
> jbarr...@pivot
On 21/05/2015 05:34, William Markito wrote:
> +1 for gsh (Geode Shell)
+1
> Existing users and customers of GemFire could create a link/alias or maybe
> Pivotal can do it as part of packaging the product so nobody has to change
> anything in the current setup.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>>
What about GISH (GemFire/Geode interactive shell)?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> I think we should just leave it as gfsh. If anyone asks what the F stands
> for, just stare at them blankly :)
>
>
> or Geode's Fabulous SHell?
>
> -Dan
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Gre
+1 for gsh (Geode Shell)
Existing users and customers of GemFire could create a link/alias or maybe
Pivotal can do it as part of packaging the product so nobody has to change
anything in the current setup.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 20, 2015, at 6:17 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
>> On
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
> I think we should just leave it as gfsh. If anyone asks what the F stands
> for, just stare at them blankly :)
>
Difficult to do on a mailing list!
Niall
>
> or Geode's Fabulous SHell?
>
> -Dan
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Gregory
I think gosh stands for Geode functional shell. Or some other friendly
word. We're going to drive our existing customers crazy with all this
package changing and script changing. Citigroup has 53 Gem fire apps
comprising many thousands of lines of code. We're trying to force them to
change all of
gsh - G SHell - Geode SHell (my vote)
gash - Geode Again SHell (nod to bash)
gctl - Geode ConTroL
—
Jacob Barrett
Enterprise Architect
Pivotal
jbarr...@pivotal.io
503-533-3763
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Wes Williams
wrote:
> The problem with leaving it as "gfsh" is
The alternative would be gsh (/gee-shell/)... Which really starts
playing in the realm of /i-*/ and it brings up childhood memories of
/' Gee mister... you are really tall/ '
So I'd vote for /gfsh/ but at the same time... we might need something
that both incorporates Geode and GemFire..
The problem with leaving it as "gfsh" is that you already have a "gfsh"
symbol link that points to a _gemfire_ installation. If you name the geode
shell distribution as "gfsh", then when you need to switch from geode to
gemfire you will have to have a mechanism to overwrite or update the
_gemfire_
+1
Not all names have to be logical right? *Stares blankly*
Anthony
> On May 20, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>
> I think we should just leave it as gfsh. If anyone asks what the F stands
> for, just stare at them blankly :)
>
>
> or Geode's Fabulous SHell?
>
> -Dan
>
> On Wed, Ma
I run _both_ gemfire and geode on my laptop and I found this gfsh conflict
early on. I created a symbolic link named "geode" and pointed it to the
geode gfsh binary. I then just say "geode start locator ...", etc.
I thought of other alternatives but "gesh" wasn't doing it and so I just
left it "
I think we should just leave it as gfsh. If anyone asks what the F stands
for, just stare at them blankly :)
or Geode's Fabulous SHell?
-Dan
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Gregory Chase wrote:
> How about change it to "G-Shell", assuming the tool versions are same for
> both Geode and GemFi
How about change it to "G-Shell", assuming the tool versions are same for
both Geode and GemFire...
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:41 PM, John Blum wrote:
> This came up in last night's PJUG meeting (** Unleashing the Silicon Forest
> Fire: the open sourcing of GemFire **) here in PDX.
>
> In Pivotal
This came up in last night's PJUG meeting (** Unleashing the Silicon Forest
Fire: the open sourcing of GemFire **) here in PDX.
In Pivotal GemFire, the tool is called Gfsh (pronounced "G-fish", meaning
GemFire Shell).
Perhaps, we can call the Apache Geode "Shell" tool... "GOSH".
I would say "geo
32 matches
Mail list logo
