Re: svn commit: rev 47326 - in geronimo/trunk/modules: common/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/common deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment

As the commit messages says, still working on it. Great minds think alike as i've already done number 4. Commit coming soon. -David On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 12:48:31PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > I am voting -1 on this change due to > 1) the loss of information from the stack trace. To the peo

Re: svn commit: rev 47326 - in geronimo/trunk/modules: common/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/common deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment

I am voting -1 on this change due to 1) the loss of information from the stack trace. To the people who need to see one, then they should see all the information; cutting out levels to simplify the display to end users is not a solution to giving them proper diagnostic information. 2) the

Re: Struts on Geronimo

I successfully deployed an application of mine that uses Struts actions and Tiles. I put the required struts and commons jars in the WEB-INF\lib directory. I expect you could also place them in the Geronimo repository and define the dependencies in your geronimo-jetty.xml file. On Mon, 27 Sep 2

Struts on Geronimo

Hi everyone! Does Geronimo support applications that use Struts? If yes, is there anything in particular that I have to do to get it working? Thanks in advance, Sai A

Re: svn commit: rev 47239 - in geronimo/trunk/modules: client-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/client/builder connector/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment connector/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/plugin deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/service deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/util j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment j2ee/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment jetty/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/jetty/deployment

On Sep 27, 2004, at 5:13 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Style question... why have the param Object planFile, rather than overload with real types? lazyness... it was originally File planFile, but then I got to the point where I need to pass an xmlbeans object though, so I just made it Object. -d

Re: svn commit: rev 47239 - in geronimo/trunk/modules: client-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/client/builder connector/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment connector/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/plugin deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/service deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/util j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment j2ee/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment jetty/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/jetty/deployment

Style question... why have the param Object planFile, rather than overload with real types? On Sep 26, 2004, at 1:27 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Sep 26, 2004, at 3:55 AM, David Jencks wrote: This might be moving in a good direction overall, but one aspect totally sucks, namely that in the Modul

Re: Do resource-ref's still work?

They are handled by the environment refs group, not individually. david jencks On Sep 26, 2004, at 10:26 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: Looking in geronimo-jetty.xsd the resource-ref definition is commented out - is there something that is stopping them working? -- Jeremy

Do resource-ref's still work?

Looking in geronimo-jetty.xsd the resource-ref definition is commented out - is there something that is stopping them working? -- Jeremy

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-291) Broken links on geronimo.apache.org

The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Alan Cabrera Created: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 9:19 PM Body: It seems that the specs directory is no longer built by default. I have fixed my site build to account for this. I removed the links that were broken. ---

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-291) Broken links on geronimo.apache.org

Message: The following issue has been closed. - View the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-291 Here is an overview of the issue: -

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-323) Too strict checking on access to login page

Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-323 Here is an overview of the issue: -