[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-558) distribute doesn't deploy web apps

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-558?page=comments#action_58252 ] toby cabot commented on GERONIMO-558: - Wow! Log a bug, drink a couple of beers, come back, bug is fixed. Thanks David! distribute doesn't deploy web apps

Re: SpringApplicationImpl

On Jan 28, 2005, at 3:39 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote: Jeremy Boynes wrote: From the source: // I know that this should not be here (in the j2ee package) but, // until someone who knows what they are doing has time to have a look // at it, this seems the path of least resistance... Move to the spring

runtime vs builder, was: SpringApplicationImpl

Adding to what David said with some clarification of runtime vs. builder. The intention is that running systems contain only the stuff needed to actually run applications. They use a Geronimo kernel to load and manage Configurations, where each Configuration is a package of GBean instances and

XMLBeans in server.jar manifest classpath?

Is this still needed? Is there a way we can remove it? Thanks -- Jeremy

Re: XMLBeans in server.jar manifest classpath?

I don't think it should be in the manifest classpath at all. Even in the case of the deployer.jar it should not be needed as it can be loaded by the deployer system configuration. The stuff in there should be only what is required to bootstrap to the point where we can load additional

Re: Is this really the correct svn certificate?

Jeremy Boynes wrote: David Jencks wrote: I am now getting a non-expired certificate: Error validating server certificate for 'https://svn.apache.org:443': - The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the fingerprint to validate the certificate manually! Certificate information:

Re: XMLBeans in server.jar manifest classpath?

I tried removing it and got into a lot of classloader problems I didn't want to deal with right now. If anyone wants to investigate further, that would be wonderful. I planned to look again when I get a chance to update the xmlbeans plugin to xmlbeans 2. thanks david jencks On Jan 29, 2005,

Re: Is this really the correct svn certificate?

David Jencks wrote: I was given a choice of rejecting, accepting temporarily, or accepting permanently. Before Jeremy's reassurance I accepted temporarily, but have now accepted permanently Doh! I was doing update via maven m:update and didn't even think to use svn itself :( I used so much to