[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-599) Allow sophisticated processing of xml-valued gbean attributes

2005-03-02 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
Allow sophisticated processing of xml-valued gbean attributes - Key: GERONIMO-599 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-599 Project: Geronimo Type: New Feature Components: core

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-599) Allow sophisticated processing of xml-valued gbean attributes

2005-03-02 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-599?page=history ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-599: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version: 1.0-M4 implemented in revision 155858. Comments welcome. Allow sophisticated processing of xml-valued gbean

Re: Axis GBean is deployable?

2005-03-02 Thread Srinath Perera
Sorry for the late answer, David Blevins say he will move some ews code in to the geronimo (I think that is the commit David's mention). Thanks David for clarification as I too trying to catch up the things Venket If you can lend a hand I will also try to help if I can to get around the things

RE: mx4j 3.0.1 upgrade [svn commit: r155800]

2005-03-02 Thread Bordet, Simone
Hi, Quick qustion: Should now we always, use the mx4j artifactId and specifically never use mx4j-jmx? Is there a difference between these two archives or are they just pseudonyms? mx4j.jar contains JSR 3 specification classes (javax.management.*) and implementation classes (mx4j.*).

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-580) CMP create, remove, and recreate throws org.tranql.cache.DuplicateIdentityException

2005-03-02 Thread Gianny DAMOUR (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-580?page=history ] Gianny DAMOUR closed GERONIMO-580: -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version: 1.0-M4 This has been fixed. An itests test has been added to verify the behavior. CMP create, remove, and

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-598) ejbFind or ejbSelect following ejbCreate within the same TX context

2005-03-02 Thread Gianny DAMOUR (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-598?page=history ] Gianny DAMOUR closed GERONIMO-598: -- Resolution: Fixed This has been fixed. An optional element, namely flush-cache-before-query, indicates if the transaction cache is to be

Re: svn commit: r155882 - geronimo/trunk/modules/kernel/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/ReferenceMap.java

2005-03-02 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
I think the copyright year in the header should be 2005. :) geir On Mar 1, 2005, at 9:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: dblevins Date: Tue Mar 1 21:50:40 2005 New Revision: 155882 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=155882 Log: Handy little implementation of map that indexes

Re: Deployment EJB with Mail Resource References

2005-03-02 Thread Mark
I'll adjust the plan and then submit a patch. Mark David Jencks wrote: It looks like despite all the work on mail lately no one remembered to put a mail gbean in the j2ee-server-plan.xml or anywhere else. Adding something like this to your app plan or j2ee-server-plan.xml should help:

[jira] Reopened: (GERONIMO-580) CMP create, remove, and recreate throws org.tranql.cache.DuplicateIdentityException

2005-03-02 Thread Gianny DAMOUR (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-580?page=history ] Gianny DAMOUR reopened GERONIMO-580: The fix does not work in the following scenario: * the first create generates an INSERT statement; * the remove generates a DELETE statement;

Re: [jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-598) ejbFind or ejbSelect following ejbCreate within the same TX context

2005-03-02 Thread Dain Sundstrom
This should be the default mode. The spec requires flushing, but we can optionally turn it off. -dain -- Dain Sundstrom Chief Architect Gluecode Software 310.536.8355, ext. 26 On Mar 2, 2005, at 3:53 AM, Gianny DAMOUR (JIRA) wrote: [

Re: Deployment EJB with Mail Resource References

2005-03-02 Thread Mark
David, I've got the resource ref to work - thanks. However, I have a few observations: 1. During deployment resource references appear to be resolved by looking for a gbean with a matching namePart as the needed resource reference. 2. Instead of changing the j2ee-server-plan.xml , it would

mx4j-3.0.1.jar

2005-03-02 Thread Hari Kodungallur
Hi, Today's build breaks because it can not download the mx4j-3.0.1.jar file (this upgrade for mx4j was done yesterday, I think). After manually downloading it into .maven, I am able to build it. Are these files already in any of the maven.remote.repo directories? Just wanted to know whether

Re: mx4j-3.0.1.jar

2005-03-02 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Hari Kodungallur wrote: Hi, Today's build breaks because it can not download the mx4j-3.0.1.jar file (this upgrade for mx4j was done yesterday, I think). After manually downloading it into .maven, I am able to build it. Are these files already in any of the maven.remote.repo directories? Just

Re: mx4j-3.0.1.jar

2005-03-02 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Mar 2, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Hari Kodungallur wrote: Hi, Today's build breaks because it can not download the mx4j-3.0.1.jar file (this upgrade for mx4j was done yesterday, I think). After manually downloading it into .maven, I am able to build it. I thought David fixed that last night. Do you

Re: mx4j-3.0.1.jar

2005-03-02 Thread Ralf Barkow
Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Mar 2, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Hari Kodungallur wrote: Hi, Today's build breaks because it can not download the mx4j-3.0.1.jar file (this upgrade for mx4j was done yesterday, I think). After manually downloading it into .maven, I am able to build it. I thought David fixed that

Re: mx4j-3.0.1.jar

2005-03-02 Thread Hari Kodungallur
It fails in specs/j2ee-management. The project.xml has the URL pointing to mx4j.sourceforge.net. Changing that to http://openejb.codehaus.org/maven did not make any difference; it still complained about not being able to download mx4j-3.0.1.jar [I just did a completely new/clean build with the