Changes required to Geronimo to work with Log4j 1.3 (alpha-6)
-
Key: GERONIMO-611
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-611
Project: Geronimo
Type: Task
Reporter: John Sisson
Changes are r
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-611?page=comments#action_61043 ]
Jeremy Boynes commented on GERONIMO-611:
Are you also investigating UGLI?
> Changes required to Geronimo to work with Log4j 1.3 (alpha-6)
> ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-611?page=comments#action_61046 ]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-611:
--
After reading the heated exchanges in
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143 , the comments
regarding UGLI a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-609?page=comments#action_61047 ]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-609:
--
Sorry, I was thinking of Servlet classloading, not standard classloading.
I am at a bit of a loss as to how to solve this prob
Yap, Dims and David .. I will move the TestCase to the axis-builder
Just a random thought ..
the AxisWebServiceContainer not work with just any SOAPService and
expect certain value to be set. Since the normal user do not see this
details it is not critical.
but it does not live up to the expec
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:45:54AM +0600, Srinath Perera wrote:
> Yap, Dims and David .. I will move the TestCase to the axis-builder
Cool.
I have some pending changes, so it may fail in the meantime. If it does, just
hang tight till I can get things checked in.
> Just a random thought ..
>
> I have some pending changes, so it may fail in the meantime. If it does,
> just hang tight till I can get things checked in.
>
cool
>
> > And when I tried with the most natural way to get a
> > SOAPService (by parsing axis DD, deploy.wsdd) and run the
> > AxisWebServiceContainer with that S
Hello,
I just noticed that ActiveMQ moved from CVS to SVN. So I looked at
geronimo's latest maven.xml and ActiveMQ checkout has been removed. So,
I just wanted to know whether we just depend on the ActiveMQ jar file
instead of building ActiveMQ.
Thanks much!
-Hari
That is correct.
The combined build of geronimo, openejb, and tranql is actually a
rather bad idea although IMO required by the current module structure.
I've been hoping for several months that we could move to a more
sensible comprehensive build system but it may still not happen for
some ti
OpenORBStubClassLoader needs to track parent cl
---
Key: GERONIMO-612
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-612
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: OpenEJB
Versions: 1.0-M3
Reporter: David J
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-612?page=history ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-612:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version: 1.0-M4
fixed. Openejb doesn't have revision numbers. Could use review. I think this
class has a memory leak
Yes...we will depend on the jar.
Jeff
Hari Kodungallur wrote:
Hello,
I just noticed that ActiveMQ moved from CVS to SVN. So I looked at
geronimo's latest maven.xml and ActiveMQ checkout has been removed. So,
I just wanted to know whether we just depend on the ActiveMQ jar file
instead of building A
12 matches
Mail list logo