Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Jeremy,
hehehe...problem is i just added some Serializable stuff in axis w/o
even thinking about it because Geronimo guys told me they needed it.
now, i can't change it :(
Muhahaha, that'll teach you to be helpful ;-)
I don't know what you changed but please remember that we
David,
Thanks for the tip. I am attaching patches for
running Geronimo without EJB for review. I am using
the minimal server.
Thanks
Anita
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These already exist, but you can't use a generic
> one.
>
> You can simply leave out the ejb builder and th
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Also, wearing my end user hat, I'm not as concerned about this
issue as stated -- Every time I upgrade, for example, JBoss, I install it
into a new directory, reapply any configuration changes, and redeploy my
apps. It might be different if the product offered an "upgrade in
Jeremy,
hehehe...problem is i just added some Serializable stuff in axis w/o
even thinking about it because Geronimo guys told me they needed it.
now, i can't change it :(
-- dims
On 5/14/05, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oh, for Pete's sake, this poll is about as Fair and Balanc
Oh, for Pete's sake, this poll is about as Fair and Balanced as Fox News.
How about:
PROJECT POLL:
[ ] We, ${projectName}, didn't really mean it when we said something
was Serializable and feel free to change our APIs and
implementation at any time without telling you.
[ ] We do ou
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On May 14, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Tim,
As you point out, the problem of serialization is far reaching.
Basically, we need to get every project included in Geronimo to buy
into serialization stability, and to my knowledge there are
Just FYI, "entire runtime object serialized (axis integration)" was a
choice...usually Axis uses a deployment descriptor (even jonas uses
these xml based wsdd descriptors)but the decision to use
serialized runtime objects was conscious one in Geronimo.
Yes, need more information...(or more tim
On May 14, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Tim,
As you point out, the problem of serialization is far reaching.
Basically, we need to get every project included in Geronimo to
buy into serialization stability, and to my knowledge there are
no projects in Geron
David Blevins wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 09:47:31AM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Paying attention is an understatement. In order to serialize
data to and from class definitions, those classes cannot change
in any significant way, ever. No refactoring, repackaging,
reorgani
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Tim,
As you point out, the problem of serialization is far reaching.
Basically, we need to get every project included in Geronimo to buy
into serialization stability, and to my knowledge there are no projects
in Geronimo that today have committed to this. In addition,
Tim,
As you point out, the problem of serialization is far reaching.
Basically, we need to get every project included in Geronimo to buy
into serialization stability, and to my knowledge there are no
projects in Geronimo that today have committed to this. In addition,
Geronimo itself is d
I'd like some more information before answering this poll.
Namely, what exactly is serialized? I guess I was under the impression
that "configuration information" was serialized. You make it sound like,
for example, ActiveMQ itself is serialized. Shouldn't we be able to
serialize a bun
On May 14, 2005, at 7:28 AM, David Blevins wrote:
I really want to get some feedback from the developers, users,
lurkers, other projects and everyone on this subject. It shouldn't be
a taboo to talk about or considered a "can of worms" or a "hot
button." It affects the project at pretty fundam
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 09:47:31AM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> David Blevins wrote:
> >On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:42:58PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> >>Solving the compatibility problem will require the developers to
> >>pay attention to versioning. We will need to require that at some
> >>poin
I really want to get some feedback from the developers, users, lurkers, other
projects and everyone on this subject. It shouldn't be a taboo to talk about
or considered a "can of worms" or a "hot button." It affects the project at
pretty fundamental level, so I think it would be good if we did
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Okay, well, as long as we've opened this can of worms...
Jeremy, what is your intention WRT editing configurations without
the server running?
You know I'm not going to give a short answer to a question like that
;-) I'm going to move it to another thread.
For examp
Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14-05-2005 17:47:31:
>
>
> Another thing to remember is that the only classes where serialization
> compatibility really matters are those that are actually placed in
> persistent attributes. I would hope all the projects we use do support
> serializat
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-647?page=all ]
anita kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-647:
Attachment: UnavailableEJBReferenceBuilder.patch
UnavailableServiceReferenceBuilder.patch
UnavailableWebService
Okay, well, as long as we've opened this can of worms...
Jeremy, what is your intention WRT editing configurations without
the server running? For example, let's say you do a default install, but
do not start the server. Now you start a different product that binds to
port 8080.
Latest GBean naming conventions
---
Key: GERONIMO-647
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-647
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Environment: All Environments
Reporter: anita kulshreshtha
Priority: Minor
Following classe
David Blevins wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:42:58PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Solving the compatibility problem will require the developers to
pay attention to versioning. We will need to require that at some
point though.
Paying attention is an understatement. In order to serialize data to
Hi Katia,
Fantastico y muchas gracias!
Just open a JIRA issue and attach it. We can then get it taken care of.
Thanks,
Jeff
Katia Aresti Gonzalez wrote:
Hello everybody!!!
I have finished my spanish documentation about Geronimo. I have included
the following parts:
- Install and building from
Hello everybody!!!
I have finished my spanish documentation about Geronimo. I have included the following parts:
- Install and building from source
- Configuration of Database pool
- Configuration of JMS
- Configuration en Deploy of EJBs, all types JAR
- WAR applications
- EAR application
- Cli
23 matches
Mail list logo
