Hi all,
I tried to build geronimo source which was downloaded three days ago with svn. And I got the following error when assembly module was being built.BUILD FAILEDFile.. C:\Documents and Settings\anushka\.maven\cache\maven-multiproject-plu
gin-1.3.1\plugin.jellyElement... maven:reactorLine.
On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:33 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Ok ...I am hijacking this thread... enough discussion...lets vote
on it...
[X] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
-dain
Sachin Patel wrote:
Yes we could change the project names to distinguish. Since all the
eclipse plugins start with org.eclipse.*, should we avoid using another
organization name in the title?, what about
org.apache.geronimo.tools.core?
I'd rather prefer org.apache.geronimo.eclipse.core
Thats sounds good, I'll change to *eclipse.core as well as move the
artifacts out of the geronimo group.
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Sachin Patel wrote:
Yes we could change the project names to distinguish. Since all the
eclipse plugins start with org.eclipse.*, should we avoid using
another orga
Anushka Kumar wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to build geronimo source which was downloaded three days ago
with svn. And I got the following error when assembly module was being
built.
Hi Anushka,
(Please send user questions to user@geronimo.apache.org)
Weren't any other problems before Maven finis
On Sep 7, 2005, at 7:51 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Sachin Patel wrote:
Yes we could change the project names to distinguish. Since all
the eclipse plugins start with org.eclipse.*, should we avoid
using another organization name in the title?, what about
org.apache.geronimo.tools.cor
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 6, 2005, at 7:09 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
> > Now that we frozen the list for what will go into
> M5, and based on the
> > answers for QA/release dates, I propose the QA cut
> for M5 to occur on
> > Sept
> > 21, followed by a release on Se
On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:33 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
[X] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
It is, but avoids the chance of a namespace collision later...
You're right. In the age of IDEs, it shouldn't be a problem, either. I
can't however persuade myself that o.a.g.devtools.eclipse is better than
o.a.g.tools.eclipse ;)
geir
Jacek
I am waiting for this patch.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: typo compile error
> I have a fix for these ready to commit - just testing the rest of the
build.
> --
> Jeremy
>
> Sachin Pate
On Sep 7, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
It is, but avoids the chance of a namespace collision later...
You're right. In the age of IDEs, it shouldn't be a problem,
either. I can't however persuade myself that o.a.g.devtools.eclipse
is better than o.
Date: Tue Sep 6 16:38:20 2005
New Revision: 279180
He Jiadong wrote:
I am waiting for this patch.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: typo compile error
I have a fix for these ready to
Anushka Kumar wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to build geronimo source which was downloaded three days ago
with svn. And I got the following error when assembly module was being
built.
BUILD FAILED
File.. C:\Documents and
Settings\anushka\.maven\cache\maven-multiproject-plu
gin-1.3.1\plugin.je
On 9/7/05, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[X] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61Ehttp://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-8?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-8:
Attachment: patch.txt
> Create a feature-assembly project
> -
>
> Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-8
>
[ ] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
[X] I think it should be after Friday...and should be on 9/16/05
BTW, in the future, please start a vote on a new email thread.
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:49 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
[ ] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
[X] I think it should be after Friday...and should be on 9/16/05
Can you shine a little light on why? Was there something missed that
you want to get in there?
BTW, in the future, please start a vot
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 9/7/2005 10:06 AM:
On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:49 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
[ ] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
[X] I think it should be after Friday...and should be on 9/16/05
Can you shine a little light on why? Was there something missed that
you want to get in
I'm not a committer but I'd like to add my backing for 9/9 QA cut.
I think we have to keep produce regular milestones/releases to keep the
momentum.
:
[X] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
--
Joe Bohn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he ca
NPE in WebManagerPortlet and ConnectorPortlet
--
Key: GERONIMO-981
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-981
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: console
Versions: 1.0-M5
Environment: Windows X
It's been pointed out to me that we still don't use the mirror system
for our downloads. We need to fix this ASAP.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ ] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
[X] I think it should be after Friday...and should be on 9/16/05
I have been disturbed over the last two weeks. However, the DDL creation Ant
task that I have been working on is nearly done (integration tests being
implemented). I would like to check it in over
Great. A very long time we talked about doing this but there was
pushback as it was against policy to ship non-final releases from /
www/www.apache.org/dist/, which is mirrored. So we put them on /www/
cvs.apache.org/dist/ instead.
I've moved over all our milestones to www/www.apache.org/di
When I do a m:rebuild-all the itests fail for me with:
itest:setup:
[echo] Preprocessing security-plan.xml
[delete] Deleting directory
/home/jeremy/geronimo/trunk/openejb/modules/itests/target/geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT
[unzip] Expanding:
/home/jeremy/.maven/repository/geronimo/distribut
After GBean changes some JSR77 objects don't have a statisticsProvider attribute
Key: GERONIMO-982
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-982
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Co
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-981?page=comments#action_12322902
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-981:
---
Exception info :
16:33:16,824 ERROR [PortletFragment] Error in Portlet
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.geronimo.c
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-981?page=comments#action_12322903
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-981:
---
Oops... I copied the wrong exception into the last comment (it's still related
but this one is in a locally modified version of anoth
Hi Guys,
I compiled up a new Geronimo, and then I left it running with the Server
Info page displayed so I could see the cool AJX work there... and then I
forgot about it for a day or so. When I got back it was saying:
Kernel
Kernel Boot Time Tue Sep 06 11:35:32 MDT 2005
Kernel Up Time
It may be the console. For example, the console creates a lot of
proxies and doesn't close/release them -- I'm not sure whether that would
cause a memory leak, though I hope not. I guess we need to try the test
with some kind of JVM instrumentation going so we can see what's filling
up th
On 9/8/05, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've moved over all our milestones to www/www.apache.org/dist/ andwww/www.apache.org/dist/java-repository. I assume those will bemirrored to Ibiblio and other places by tonight.
For the old releases, once they appear in archive.apache.org, you
Hi Aaron,
Just in case it helps, I was connected to the SSL port of the web server
when it happened. Out of Memory errors are not a lot of fun to debug,
but maybe there's something I can try on my end to reproduce it, and
figure out what objects are being retained. I'll let you know.
-Neal
Same here.
Aaron
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> When I do a m:rebuild-all the itests fail for me with:
>
> itest:setup:
> [echo] Preprocessing security-plan.xml
> [delete] Deleting directory
> /home/jeremy/geronimo/trunk/openejb/modules/itests/target/geronimo-1.0-S
Hi again, Aaron,
Well, I did some profiling, and found that the predominant object that
was being retained was:
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.RawGetAttributeInvoker
Unfortunately I'm no profiling expert, and I may have done it wrong, but
that's what seems to bubble to the top. When I run
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Neal Sanche wrote:
> Well, I did some profiling, and found that the predominant object that
> was being retained was:
>
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.RawGetAttributeInvoker
>
> There are also another slowly growing group of geronimo classes that
> seem to pile up, and th
Memory used by proxies isn't released by dereferencing the proxy (I speculate)
--
Key: GERONIMO-983
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-983
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Compon
Console throws OutOfBoundsexception when app erroneously has a
tag
--
Key: GERONIMO-984
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-984
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-984?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-984:
---
Attachment: patch.diff
Patch for affected problem.
> Console throws OutOfBoundsexception when app erroneously has a
> tag
> -
I tried more than 5 times in past weeks, none succeeded. I got same errors that
is almost same as below.
Stephen Kong.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 8 September 2005 2:58 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Failure in itest with m
CMP FBPK Yields an individual SELECT per column
---
Key: GERONIMO-985
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-985
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Versions: 1.0-M5
Environment: Geronimo w/Derby
Reporter:
39 matches
Mail list logo
