Provide jetty and tomcat plan schemas so the namespace can determine the builder
Key: GERONIMO-1027
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1027
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
I've changed the schema namespaces and files to include version
numbers, and am using an xmlbeans feature so the old namespaces still
work. Currently the namespace versions look like this:
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/application-client-1.0
The openejb schemas look like this:
http:
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I will probably get committed into head by the
> time you read this
> and then plan to port to M5 is:
>
> in assembly, we will deploy the applications
> (console, welcome, and
> juddi-server) onto both jetty and tomcat (6
> configurations) (I
Hi,
i want to part of geronimo.
polese add my name.
thanks
Regards,
srinivasu cheedalla.
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner now.
Geronimo kernel is a great kernel,But how can I develop application
base the kerenal? Or how can I embed geronimo in my application? Which
modules should I use under $GERONOMO_SRC/modules/ director ?
On 9/28/05, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Anyone have a problem with the -x.y version style?
Looks good to me
> 2. Should the openejb schemas be version 2.0 (following openejb) or 1.0
> (not sure why this would be plausible)
I vote 2.0
> 3. Should I change the css/tss namespaces
On 9/28/05, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > GERONIMO-518 - Deploying Struts app fails on Logging ClassCastException
> >
> > Aaron, looking at your latest comments this doesn't seems so easy to
> > solve. I wonder if we shouldn't add this to the "Significant Missing
> > Features" secti
--- Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 9/28/05, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > GERONIMO-518 - Deploying Struts app fails on
> Logging ClassCastException
> > >
> > > Aaron, looking at your latest comments this
> doesn't seems so easy to
> > > solve. I wonder if we sho
I would definitely object to removing it from M5. And for that
matter, I object to you characterizing it as "thoroughly broken"
without looking. And if you have no idea how it's supposed to be used
or how to go about fixing it, why don't you ask for help? I'm sure
someone who's familiar with the
Aaron,
The current proposal is that there will be just 1 distribution package
for Geronimo which includes 3 configuration files (one for both tomcat &
jetty, just jetty, and just tomcat). However, I'm with you in that I
don't understand how this will practically work for applications that
mu
On Sep 28, 2005, at 8:44 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I would definitely object to removing it from M5. And for that
matter, I object to you characterizing it as "thoroughly broken"
without looking.
well, I looked at what was in the izpack config files and what is
configured to assemble geronimo a
On 9/28/05, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well, I looked at what was in the izpack config files and what is
> configured to assemble geronimo and they don't have a very close
> relationship to each other. I think it's a safe conclusion that it
> won't work. I hope I'm wrong.
"Won't w
On Sep 28, 2005, at 12:52 AM, David Jencks wrote:
1. Anyone have a problem with the -x.y version style?
I like that pattern too.
2. Should the openejb schemas be version 2.0 (following openejb) or
1.0 (not sure why this would be plausible)
Let's use 2.0, then I can change the namespace o
Hardcoded dependency versions in deployment.model-project.xml
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-14
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-14
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Type: Bug
Environment: Maven
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-14?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-14:
-
Attachment: DevTools-14.patch
Patch to update project.properties and project.xml have been attached.
> Hardcoded dependency versions
On Sep 28, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 9/28/05, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GERONIMO-518 - Deploying Struts app fails on Logging
ClassCastException
Aaron, looking at your latest comments this doesn't seems so easy to
solve. I wonder if we shouldn't add this to t
On Sep 28, 2005, at 9:52 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 9/28/05, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
well, I looked at what was in the izpack config files and what is
configured to assemble geronimo and they don't have a very close
relationship to each other. I think it's a safe conclusion th
FYI, don't forget to check these fixes into the M5 branch as well.
-David
On Sep 27, 2005, at 8:57 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 26, 2005, at 2:30 PM, David Blevins wrote:
THE FINAL STUFF
1. clean the jira
So we're down to a handful of Jira issues to lockup before we can
finish the r
Correct some annoying problems with the WebLogViewerPortlet
---
Key: GERONIMO-1028
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1028
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: console
Versions: 1.0-M5
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1028?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1028:
---
Attachment: weblog.patch
Added fixed portlet and jsp
> Correct some annoying problems with the WebLogViewerPortlet
> -
tomcat web log seems to be created with wrong name and isn't found by the web
log viewer portlet
Key: GERONIMO-1029
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1029
Proje
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1029?page=comments#action_12330767
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-1029:
-
This is the default date for the naming conventions for the access valves for
Tomcat. It looks correct according to its
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1029?page=all ]
Jeff Genender reassigned GERONIMO-1029:
---
Assign To: Jeff Genender
> tomcat web log seems to be created with wrong name and isn't found by the web
> log viewer portlet
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1027?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1027:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Head rev 292333
Many openejb changes
M5 rev 292376
openejb M5 changes are committed.
> Provide jetty and tomcat plan schemas so t
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-957?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-957:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Head rev 292333
Many openejb changes
M5 rev 292376
openejb M5 changes are committed.
versions on both schemas and files are -1.0 or
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1029?page=comments#action_12330770
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1029:
There is no "needed format" -- the format used by the TomcatLogManagerImpl just
needs to match the format used by the Tomc
26 matches
Mail list logo
