Dear Geir
Looks fine to me... See you in Amsterdam next week. We have been trying
to get in touch with Alan, do you know if he will be at OSCON?
Best regards
Joern
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
PRC -
Can you please quickly review? We'd like to get out ASAP.
-
Apache Geronimo
Now that we have achieved the covetted J2EE Certification, we need to
start thinking about some of the things we will need to have in Geronimo
in order to be mass adopted by the Enterprise.
IMHO, I think one of the huge holes is clustering. This is a heavy need
by many companies and I
Can we level-set the conversation (in this subthread) by describing the
current clustering options available in Geronimo. It seems that Tomcat
and Jetty already have some level of web tier clustering. Can a
geronimo user easily leverage this support?
Specifically, Tomcat supports Load
With a fresh checkout this morning I'm getting the following compile error:
default:
java:prepare-filesystem:
[mkdir] Created dir:
C:\Geronimo\geronimo\openejb\modules\core\target\classe
s
java:compile:
[depend] Deleted 0 out of date files in 0 seconds
[echo] Compiling to
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Can we level-set the conversation (in this subthread) by describing the
current clustering options available in Geronimo.
It seems that Tomcat
and Jetty already have some level of web tier clustering. Can a
geronimo user easily leverage this support?
Speaking from a
Personally, if Tomcat can do clustering today (web based workloads are most
common anyway) I'd say we add it. If the user needs clustering for Web their
good to go out of the box. I want to play fair against the various packages
we're pulling in but I think not offering an option because not
Network Listeners added through console are lost upon server restart
Key: GERONIMO-1070
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1070
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: console
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Personally, if Tomcat can do clustering today (web based workloads are
most common anyway) I'd say we add it. If the user needs clustering for
Web their good to go out of the box.
+1
trust material/truststore for Jetty and Tomcat HTTPS Connectors
---
Key: GERONIMO-1071
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1071
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: security
Hi,
I am sorry that i can not check it now, this is the computer at my home.
It's the first time that I built the geronimo in this computer, all thing is
updated according Geronimo Wiki and just downloaded from internet.
I don't find xmlbean-2.0.0.jar in my local maven repository, but I did
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1062?page=comments#action_12332080
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-1062:
Nice test, John.
From the memory statistics, it looks like you're running out of Permanent
Generation space. I've seen
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-983?page=all ]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-983:
--
Attachment: BasicProxyMap.patch
Yet another solution to this problem... ;-)
BasicProxyMap is an implementation of a WeakIdentityHashMap (class size
I'm working on the debug console;
looking for requirements feedback;
show all gbeans and dirll down to attributes and attribute info
show configurations
focus on selected configuration
show wars, ears, etc
show connection factories (jdbc, jms)
show security realms
basically we can show any type of
On Oct 14, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Can we level-set the conversation (in this subthread) by
describing the current clustering options available in Geronimo.
It seems that Tomcat and Jetty already have some level of web tier
clustering. Can a
There are several things that we could do here:
1) Keep and extend the debug console as noted below.
2) Eliminate it completely (possibly integrating the essential portions
into the web console.
3) Integrate it completely into the web console in it's own area of
the navigation. This could
Better error for bad EJB QL
---
Key: GERONIMO-1072
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1072
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: OpenEJB
Versions: 1.0-M5
Reporter: Aaron Mulder
Fix For: 1.0
I have 2
oops
I'm hoping to have a more complete fix for the problems introduced by
the new principal wrapping ready very shortly. If I run into problems
I'll try to fix just this error.
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 14, 2005, at 6:09 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
With a fresh checkout this morning I'm
David,
I'm already half into the configuration/builder for the new wrapped
principals.
Regards,
Alan
David Jencks wrote, On 10/14/2005 8:47 AM:
oops
I'm hoping to have a more complete fix for the problems introduced by
the new principal wrapping ready very shortly. If I run into
Good response to the Logo Contest and thanks for your votes.
# 19 is clearly in the lead with #21 lagging a bit. Don't forget, only two days
remaining. Here are the votes so far:
0 Entry #1
1 Entry #2
0 Entry #3
0 Entry #4
0
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Speaking from a Tomcat perspective, I just need to add the clustering
GBeans and it should be available immediately. But this only
addresses the web tier, which is not good enough.
It's great - are you kidding? :)
I know...but I didn't want to implement
On Oct 14, 2005, at 2:40 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Speaking from a Tomcat perspective, I just need to add the
clustering GBeans and it should be available immediately. But
this only addresses the web tier, which is not good enough.
It's great - are you
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
What %age of users will be able to take advantage of this? 90%? :)
What other ways are you thinking of clustering?
JMS, EJB, Caching, etc.
geir
Can we get the interim fix in for this for now? I am S.O.L. on the
build and need it to continue with some of my development.
Thanks,
Jeff
David Jencks wrote:
oops
I'm hoping to have a more complete fix for the problems introduced by
the new principal wrapping ready very shortly. If I
Jeff Genender wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
What %age of users will be able to take advantage of this? 90%? :)
What other ways are you thinking of clustering?
JMS, EJB, Caching, etc.
Here are some of the characteristics of clustering that we should consider:
JSP/Servlet Load
Nice! Keep it coming Dave!
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
What %age of users will be able to take advantage of this? 90%? :)
What other ways are you thinking of clustering?
JMS, EJB, Caching, etc.
Here are some of the characteristics of
Hi All,
I created a section in confluence to group all the migration documents.
I have to insist, confluence is way more user friendly than the
Apache wiki, the the final look of the articles is better and the time
for formating is not even half compared to wiki.
With that said, enough of
TradeDirect:init error on JNDI lookups of DataSource when TradeDataSource is
already running
Key: GERONIMO-1073
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1073
Project:
On Oct 14, 2005, at 4:01 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
What %age of users will be able to take advantage of this? 90%? :)
What other ways are you thinking of clustering?
JMS, EJB, Caching, etc.
Right - our JMS already clusters, doesn't it, by virtue of it being
Hernan,
Looks good. But your servlets article discusses the geronimo-jetty.xml
which is deprecated and no longer valid. You need to mention
geronimo-web.xml instead. Also, since you are discussing both Tomcat
and Jetty, you may wish to mention how to choose a container.
Other than
Jeff Genender wrote:
Now that we have achieved the covetted J2EE Certification, we need to
start thinking about some of the things we will need to have in
Geronimo in order to be mass adopted by the Enterprise.
IMHO, I think one of the huge holes is clustering. This is a heavy
need by many
Hi,
Relationships cannot be defined in ejbCreate and should be defined in
the corresponding ejbPostCreate. The spec says (p. 188):
The entity Bean Provider must not attempt to modify the values of
cmr-fields in an ejbCreateMETHOD method. This should be done in the
ejbPostCreateMETHOD method
Hi,
Maybe I am understanding this wrong, but if I undeploy my application
(ear) from geronimo and receive the following output:
[java] Module AppName stopped.
[java] Module AppName unloaded.
[java] Module AppName uninstalled.
[java] Undeployed AppName
[java] `- AppName.war
32 matches
Mail list logo
