[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1621) [Daytrader] TradeWSAction class is not a Servlet

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1621?page=comments#action_12366089 ] Vincent Massol commented on GERONIMO-1621: -- Thanks Matt. I didn't know about this JSR-181. No this is different from the JBoss issue I raised. As I mentioned

Re: Minimal Tomcat Size Statistics and other information

2006/2/12, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I was playing with the minimal-tomcat configuration the other day. Very nice work. I wanted to get an idea of how big the image was and some other information about it. After I compiled the information I thought it would be useful to others as

Re: old specs (was: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken)

2006/2/12, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As well, I deleted the old 1.1-SNAPSHOT jars that never should ...snip... geronimo-j2ee_1.4_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar ...and (incidentally) broke [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Geronimo:: Applications: BUILD FAILED File..

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1621) [Daytrader] TradeWSAction class is not a Servlet

BTW, I'm modifying the DayTrader config at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/daytrader which is where I think you're looking. Should have it ready to release with 1.1 when we'll remove it from trunk so work from this area if possible. Thanks. Vincent Massol (JIRA) wrote: [

RE: Multiple servers sharing the same repo and config store

Hi David and everyone, Any progress on this? Thanks -Vincent -Original Message- From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 30 janvier 2006 08:23 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Multiple servers sharing the same repo and config store Many people have talked on

CGLIB Related error (take a look at it)

Hi, I am getting the following error: 19:59:38,203 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting; GBean is now in the FAILED state: objectName=geronimo.server:J2EEApplication=null,J2EEModule=ibmtask/IBMTask,J2EEServer=geronimo,j2eeType=GBean,name=MyGBean java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:

Re: Minimal Tomcat Size Statistics and other information

Matt, Thanks for pulling this together. I put a patch out on Wed. last week (GERONIMO-1613) that removed several of the jars that you mentioned (most notably derby, wadi, spring, and some odds and ends) which reduces the disk footprint down to a little over 21 meg. In addition I have a

Re: Maven apt format better? (Fwd: New website is published!)

On 2/11/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just come across it and wonder how much the apt format would help us. Is it any better than xdocs? Has anybody got any experience with it. Is it worth to try it out? I also found it at

Re: CGLIB Related error (take a look at it)

Looks like you configured a GBean called MyGBean but the configuration data (either in the plan or more likely the GBeanInfo) doesn't actually match the methods/constructors available on the GBean class. It doesn't seem to me that this problem is related to CGLib. If you want anything more

Re: old specs (was: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken)

I ran into this yesterday too :-( Does not look like the new spec build using m2 creates a jar for maven 1 with all of the dependencies. The geronimo-spec-j2ee module only builds a pom. Maybe, until we can move to m2, we should just depend on each of the spec jars and not the all-in-one

Re: old specs (was: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken)

On 2/12/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I ran into this yesterday too :-( Does not look like the new spec build using m2 creates a jar for maven 1 with all of the dependencies. The geronimo-spec-j2ee module only builds a pom. Maybe, until we can move to m2, we should just depend

Re: old specs (was: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken)

I'm in favor of keeping the 1.0 and 1.1 spec jars all separate until this can all be sorted out. Too many people are having trouble building the HEAD because of the deps on the 1.1 spec jars. I'm not sure what you man... I changed the depends on console- framework just now to use 2 depends

Re: Jira Changes

Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On 1/25/2006 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I want to add a field that marks bugs w/ a regression flag so that we can track tests that used to pass. Currently people just exclude the tests or, worse, comment them out in the code. So, it seems that the consensus is

Re: Strange IllegalAccessError w/FastClassByCGLIB class

I don't, but have you looked up what it is in StatelessInstanceFactory that generates that message? Perhaps we have a race condition? Aaron On 2/12/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone have any idea why this happens? --jason On Feb 10, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

Re: Strange IllegalAccessError w/FastClassByCGLIB class

I will look at it more... I'm not familiar with the proxy gen in G yet... but a race condition sounds likely since this problem only shows up in multithreaded concurrency test. Is there an existing test for G somewhere? I can commit my work on JMeter components if that would be helpful.