[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-1929) Enable web apps exposed on separate ports

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1929?page=all ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1929: -- Resolution: Fixed Many thanks to Jeff Genender for helping to get this working. > Enable web apps exposed on separate ports > -

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1929) Enable web apps exposed on separate ports

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1929?page=all ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-1929: --- Attachment: appPerPort.ear This is a sample app showing how to deploy 2 web apps on 2 separate ports and have the ports open after the apps have fully

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-1929) Enable web apps exposed on separate ports

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1929?page=all ] David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-1929: -- Assign To: David Jencks (was: Jeff Genender) > Enable web apps exposed on separate ports > - > >

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2031) cvs.apache.org/repository has been moved (temporarily?) to people.apache.org/repository

cvs.apache.org/repository has been moved (temporarily?) to people.apache.org/repository --- Key: GERONIMO-2031 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2031 Project: Geronimo

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2030) Allow WebServiceBuilder determine if there are WebServices to be deployed

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2030?page=comments#action_12412067 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2030: A couple of days is fine, I think I would rather wait till after 1.1 is frozen/branched to apply a patch of this impact.

Re: How do we build/run the latest Eclipse plug-in?

I just fixed that particular build error, however due to the lack of a recent openejb snapshot as well as the codehaus repo being down the build won't complete anyways. On May 16, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Lin Sun wrote: Hi Sachin, I am getting the same error when I tried to build the eclipse- p

Re: svn commit: r405881 - in /geronimo/branches/1.1: assemblies/j2ee-jetty-server/src/var/config/ assemblies/j2ee-tomcat-server/src/var/config/ assemblies/minimal-jetty-server/src/var/config/ assembli

Actually, I see that David has this on his personal "repo" so we can pick it up from there until there is an official version. But I guess we still need to get this on a more public repo before we release 1.1. Joe Joe Bohn wrote: Was it intended that this change would upgrade howl to 1.0.1?

Re: svn commit: r405881 - in /geronimo/branches/1.1: assemblies/j2ee-jetty-server/src/var/config/ assemblies/j2ee-tomcat-server/src/var/config/ assemblies/minimal-jetty-server/src/var/config/ assembli

Was it intended that this change would upgrade howl to 1.0.1? I know this was discussed with the package upgrades and David even mentioned that the jar wasn't published on any of the repos yet. That's the last I can find on the topic. It is in fact causing a problem since this version can't

[jira] Resolved: (AMQ-704) ActiveIO compromises java.lang.System.properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-704?page=all ] Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-704: --- Fix Version: 4.0 (was: 4.1) Resolution: Fixed You can now use the -Dorg.apache.activeio.journal.active.DisableLocking=true optio

RE: How do we build/run the latest Eclipse plug-in?

Hi Sachin, I am getting the same error when I tried to build the eclipse-plugin from trunk. I was hoping that I could run it as a second Eclipse instance using the runtime-workspace, so I tried to import all plugins and fragments into the workspace of my Eclipse , but saw many red errors related

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

+1 Guillaume James Strachan wrote: We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc) http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

+1 cheers, Rob On 16 May 2006, at 18:31, James Strachan wrote: We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc) http://people.apache.org/

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

+1 I want to thank everyone that has been involved in this long release and testing process. It has made ActiveMQ an outstanding piece of software! On 5/16/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it out and it seems to be

[VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc) http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distribut

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-707) makefile plus some changes for the CMS C++ client

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-707?page=all ] Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-707: -- Fix Version: 4.1 (was: 4.0 RC2) > makefile plus some changes for the CMS C++ client > - > >

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-480) add consume ability to openwire-c

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-480?page=all ] Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-480: -- Fix Version: 4.1 (was: 4.0) > add consume ability to openwire-c > - > > Key: AMQ-480 > URL:

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-704) ActiveIO compromises java.lang.System.properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-704?page=all ] Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-704: -- Fix Version: 4.1 (was: 4.0 RC2) > ActiveIO compromises java.lang.System.properties > > >

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-327) Orphanded/lost queue messages in various failover tests in two broker configuration

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-327?page=all ] Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-327: -- Fix Version: 4.1 (was: 4.0) > Orphanded/lost queue messages in various failover tests in two broker > configuration > --

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-610) fix the test case FanoutTransportBrokerTest which is failing now due to the fix for AMQ-607 by making the open of the socket occur in the start() method

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-610?page=all ] Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-610: -- Fix Version: 4.1 (was: 4.0) > fix the test case FanoutTransportBrokerTest which is failing now due to the > fix for AMQ-607 by making the op

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-663) JMX management info about subscriptions is incomplete

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-663?page=all ] Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-663: -- Fix Version: 4.1 (was: 4.0) > JMX management info about subscriptions is incomplete > - >

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-629) test case SslTransportBrokerTest not working

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-629?page=all ] Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-629: -- Fix Version: 4.1 (was: 4.0) > test case SslTransportBrokerTest not working > > > Key: A

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-648) Changing the default JMX URL

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-648?page=all ] Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-648: -- Fix Version: 4.1 (was: 4.0) > Changing the default JMX URL > > > Key: AMQ-648 > URL: https://i

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-631) verify that HttpsTransportBrokerTest won't hang on other environment

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-631?page=all ] Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-631: -- Fix Version: 4.1 (was: 4.0) > verify that HttpsTransportBrokerTest won't hang on other environment >

Re: Errors while building G1.1 from branch

The suggestion I gave about rebuilding the plugins should help Vamsi but the problem Shiva is seeing is due to a change in etc/explicit_versions.properties. It looks like the problem is due to this entry in explicit_versions.properties : org.apache.geronimo.specs///=1.0 taking precedence over th

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2030) Allow WebServiceBuilder determine if there are WebServices to be deployed

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2030?page=comments#action_12411989 ] Conrad O'Dea commented on GERONIMO-2030: I'll port it although it will probably be a couple of days before I get to it. For this to be most useful I think that the

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2030) Allow WebServiceBuilder determine if there are WebServices to be deployed

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2030?page=comments#action_12411987 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2030: Can you port this patch to 1.1? That needs to happen before it will be applied: we are going to merge trunk into 1.1 and

Re: Errors while building G1.1 from branch

the openejb build is broken unless you apply the patch attached to GERONIMO-1434. I didn't realize codehaus svn was down until after I committed the geronimo half of this issue. However I don't think this is the cause of the problem here. thanks david jencks On May 16, 2006, at 6:38 AM,

Re: Errors while building G1.1 from branch

I suggest rebuilding the plugins: cd to each plugin dir, maven clean default. Best wishes, Paul On 5/16/06, Shiva Kumar H R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I too am running into an error while building the AG 1.1 server. I am using the following command for building: "maven maven -Dmaven.test.s

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2026) 1.1 Server fails to start by throwing an InvalidConfigException for JMXService GBean

Shiva, Few days back I was trying to build and the build failed at j2ee-installer. I realized that the installer was not updated to reflect the latest changes in the configuraiotns. So I tried to fix it! I made the following changes. I was able to genarete a server that started properly, logged

Re: Errors while building G1.1 from branch

Hi,I too am running into an error while building the AG 1.1 server. I am using the following command for building: "maven maven -Dmaven.test.skip=true -Dmaven.itest.skip=true new", and the build is failing with the following exception and error. Any hints as to how I can resolve this, will be very

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2026) 1.1 Server fails to start by throwing an InvalidConfigException for JMXService GBean

Aaron,Thanks for the quick response. Yes I am interested in solving this and I am currently working on it. Got a few errors while building the Geronimo the 1.1 server. I am posting the errors onto the dev list to get some help. Regards,Shiva KumarOn 5/15/06, Aaron Mulder (JIRA)

Errors while building G1.1 from branch

After doing maven m:update, I ran maven new and got the following error.  Please help resolve this error. Thanks, Vamsi + | configurations Geronimo Configuration for per

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2030) Allow WebServiceBuilder determine if there are WebServices to be deployed

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2030?page=comments#action_12411922 ] Conrad O'Dea commented on GERONIMO-2030: BTW, this patch has been deveoped against trunk. The structure of the plans for the deployers and WebServiceBuilders is m

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2030) Allow WebServiceBuilder determine if there are WebServices to be deployed

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2030?page=all ] Conrad O'Dea updated GERONIMO-2030: --- Attachment: geronimo_ws_builder_change.patch patch to move webservice detection into WebServiceBuilder > Allow WebServiceBuilder determine if there ar

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2030) Allow WebServiceBuilder determine if there are WebServices to be deployed

Allow WebServiceBuilder determine if there are WebServices to be deployed - Key: GERONIMO-2030 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2030 Project: Geronimo Type: Improvement Secu

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1905) Confirm deploy/undeploy/redeploy for WARs with no configId

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1905?page=comments#action_12411916 ] Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-1905: - I forgot this... - 2. Redeploy with plan, no module ID: Not

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1817) "Test a Login" while adding LDAP Realm fails with NullPointerException

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1817?page=all ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-1817: -- Patch Info: [Patch Available] Patch provided. > "Test a Login" while adding LDAP Realm fails with NullPointerException > ---

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1817) "Test a Login" while adding LDAP Realm fails with NullPointerException

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1817?page=all ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-1817: -- Attachment: GERONIMO-1817.patch > "Test a Login" while adding LDAP Realm fails with NullPointerException > --

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1791) LDAP Security Realm created via Console can fail deployment

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1791?page=all ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-1791: -- Attachment: G1791.patch G1791.patch does fix this problem. > LDAP Security Realm created via Console can fail deployment > -

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1434) Allow GBeans to be bound into a component's java:comp/env namespace

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1434?page=all ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-1434: --- Attachment: 1434_openejb.diff backported 1.2 implementation to 1.1. g rev 406864, Openejb svn is down, so I'm attaching a patch for it... will apply

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1434) Allow GBeans to be bound into a component's java:comp/env namespace

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1434?page=all ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-1434: --- Attachment: 1434_sample.diff really quick sample to demonstrate gbean ref, by traducing the remote deploy app. Note that you can now specify multiple

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1905) Confirm deploy/undeploy/redeploy for WARs with no configId

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1905?page=comments#action_12411901 ] Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-1905: - I experienced the same problem as Aaron's. Here is my geronimo-web.xml and the results of my test: